Quote:
Originally Posted by 00Snitch
fwiw...
Rugby ranges from about 175-300 with the extremes of that range being quite rare. It's uncommon for a rugby player to be under 185. The "standard" big guys generally come in around 220-260 and the "standard" little guys are more like 200-230.
It used to be that the "smaller" players dominated the backline because they were fast and agile, and those type of players still exist (Bryan Habanna, Shane Williams type players), but its probably more common now to see bigger "small" guys in the backline because they can be nearly as fast as the genuine small guys and can crush the smaller guys in terms of power.
Often now when there is a genuine small guy playing professional level rugby it is because they just have mad skills and are generally play makers (think quarter-back, punter and goal kicker combined) so not really required for hard super speed or power... or fighting NFL players.
What are the ratios of big to small players on a rugby team? It looks like they might have the edge over a hockey team. Hockey players are crazy, though, but then again, I'd imagine most rugby players are similarly nuts. Give a slight advantage to rugby players in being better at tackling and bringing them to the ground as well. Also, what is the range on heights of most rugby players?
The biggest disadvantage that a football team is the defensive backs and WRs (and your Reggie Bush sized HBs). The rest of the team stacks up very well against rugby players (or slightly better). I'll take a 6'6 325lbs lineman over a "big" rugby player any time. A 6'5 220lbs qb would be able to hang with the smaller guys no problem. The question is if the rugby guys win half the fights, and the football guys win the other half, who wins?
I remember at one point a friend of mine that played rugby was saying how "there was a job for anyone" on a Rugby team. If you were huge, there's a job. If you were tiny and fast, there was a job. Probably not quite as true at elite levels as a club team.
Fans of rugby tend to overrate the toughness of rugby players vs. football players due to pads vs. no pads, though. LOL @ the idea that football players are just pussies, thats why they need pads.
LOL @ the idea that we need some kind of paper published in a peer reviewed journal just to even speculate about this. Fact is no one really knows jack about how this might go down, and it's all harmless speculation and discussion. Lighten up.