Quote:
Originally Posted by StimAbuser
I like those odds. Does no one else feel Nate was off and that there is merit to him being injured? Even in the first round his footwork seemed off and sloppy and he slowed down in the 4th which even when they are getting the hell beat out of them never happens.
I know they make a lot of excuses but only other time either of them have ever claimed injuries was Nate vs RDA and that looked to be true as well.
I rewatched the fight earlier today and even Rogan comments on nates leg looking unstable/bad in the first round. I mean some of that is the leg kicks but I don't think all of it. Nate never looked that bad with his footwork even after taking much more brutal kicks from Bendo/RDA
He was off but there's no excuse for round 4. He had McGregor reeling and he's supposed to be a cardio machine. His techniques got slow and sloppy and his output was a fraction of what it was in round 3. He let McGregor back into the fight and deserved to lose.
I'd like to write this off to injuries but Nate had no offense in the late rounds against Benson either, and that's the only fight he'd gone 5 rounds before last night. That was a bit different because Benson crushed him with wrestling, but he wore down all the same.
Nick also faded round 4 against against Anderson and GSP, with GSP outworking and outstriking him on the feet. Nick had a single fight before this where he went 5 rounds vs. Noons, which seems to be what the Diaz cardio legend is based upon.
I never thought I'd say this but maybe their cardio is just overrated. Perhaps endurance racing just isn't the strongest possible cardio base for mma.