Quote:
Originally Posted by StimAbuser
I'm confused...
Guy clearly asks what thoughts were on fake glove taps.
Seems pretty clear he's referring to the act itself, and you reply about the act it's self. You imply they are awesome. You try and back peddle by implying you only meant that specific situation, and I point out if that's the case then you have terribad reading comprehension.
What in this situation makes me the worst?
You're insisting on arguing some bull**** semantical point with me for whatever reason.
-Dude asks what we think of attacking when opponent is trying to touch gloves. (Nothing about fake glove taps in serenity21's original post so I'm not even sure what you're arguing.)
-I think it's fine (or AWESOME).
-Other people start talking about about putting up a glove to tap and then pulling back and attacking.
-I say that situation is a little douchey, but whatever.
-You start arguing semantics (and after rereading the post in question, wrongly) for whatever reason.
Last edited by MikeyPatriot; 03-20-2012 at 02:17 AM.