Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo
I disagree quite a bit about Soaked in Bleach. Not that great imo. The filmmaker's lack of access was a real problem imo. The whole thing came off a bit like the conspiracy theory of a money grubbing private investigator, which is pretty much what it is.
While I agree that the question of whether he could have shot himself after slamming so much heroin is interesting, I find the idea that Courtney Love (or someone working at her behest) dosed him with a potentially fatal slug of heroin, and then shot him, to be equally implausible. If CL wanted to kill him, then why involve a gun? Just pump him full of an absurd amount of H and let the world think he OD'd. Wayyyyyy easier to get away with.
How do you know that this PI is "money grubbing"? Can you provide something to back that up?
What do you mean by lack of access? Just because Love wasn't interviewed? Do you actually think Love would've agreed to an interview in a doc that was intent on exposing all of her lies? She'd have nothing to gain from it.
While shooting Cobain may have been unnecessary, that's nowhere near enough to convince me that Love was not involved. There is far more evidence and motives to point to Love's involvement than there is illogical reasons why she wouldn't have been involved.
- why did she repeatedly lie to the PI, especially about things she clearly would've known about Cobain, like what type of hotels he stays at?
- how do you explain the notebook in which she was practicing Cobain's handwriting? Who does that, unless they're planning something ultra shady?
- why did every person who knew Cobain instantly think the suicide note was fake when they saw it?
There are way too many unanswered questions to simply brush it off as some greedy PI cashing in on his involvement with the case. You can't ignore the evidence, even if the PI's motivations are selfish.