A few more that I had in the last week or so.
2011 3F Golden Blend. There are so many different versions of 3F geuze floating around that it's hard to keep track. From what I know, there are at least:
- Regular geuze
- Vintage geuze, which I believe is the brewer hand-picking the best barrels from a particular vintage and setting those aside to bottle separately
- Golden Blend, which includes 4-year old lambic, where traditional geuzes just blend 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year lambics
- Cuvee Armand & Gaston (A&G), which is made up of solely of lambic brewed at 3F. (About 10 years ago, there was some kind of thermostat malfunction that ruined all their already-brewed beer and maybe some of their equipment(?), so that for a number of years 3F was simply blending lambic brewed by others. But a few years ago, they started brewing again with new equipment, and the first A&G batch was the first 3F geuze featuring nothing but 3F-blended lambic.)
I've never had any vintage bottles, but I've had many bottles of the other 3 varieties. Because I've never tried to do side-by-sides, I don't have any good basis for comparing them. That being said, I feel like I've liked the A&G bottles I've had a lot, while some of the regular bottles I've opened recently have been mediocre. The 2011 Golden Blends that I've had have generally been great, but this one was a little bit of a let down. Perfectly carbonated, but I wasn't as wowed by it as I have been in the past. I don't know if that's a matter of time passing or bottle variation. Hopefully bottle variation, since I've got a few more sitting around. The A&G bottles cost about twice as much as (similarly-dated) regular geuze, so it's clearly in my interest to do a blind side-by-side to figure out if the premium is worth it.
Founders CBS:
I use Google photos, and it periodically sends me notifications of pictures I took on this date X years ago. On New Year's Eve, the notification showed me that I drank a bottle of Founders CBS on 12/31/2015. So that prompted me to open a bottle of (this year's) CBS for NYE. It was good. Worth the price ($25 or so)? I'm not sure. I'm not even sure if it was obviously better than KBS. But still good. What's interesting to me is how much easier it was to get this beer this year compared to 2011. They must have made an absolute ****-ton of it this year.
And now to the biggest disappointment of my winter break: Trappist Westvleteren 8.
The cap was stamped 2018, which I think means it was brewed 3 years ago. This beer was just flat tasting - not uncarbonated, but as if a lot of the flavor had just been sucked out. I see the term oxadized a lot, and I'm not entirely sure what it means, but I wouldn't be surprised if this qualified. I was especially disappointed because I've had bottles of Westy 12 of various ages, and I definitely think those get better with time. This was just a waste, and I didn't come close to finishing it.