V: 63/23/6/63/2.0 62 hands

fcbet 38 fflop 38

wtsd 34 wmsd 42

{Bet ~.80 pot and that's too large in 3bet pot, even vs stationy players.
Need to bet <.65 pot (2.00 max)}

Above was my initial evaluation, and I'm not sure that this is a mistake. My hand is somewhat vulnerable here, this type of board tends to get a lot of flop action, and both players are fully stacked.

iPoker, Hold'em No Limit - $0.05/$0.10 - 7 players
Replay this hand on Upswing Poker

P6_522740NC (UTG): $19.25 (193 bb)
P7_860619VV (MP): $8.10 (81 bb)
P8_854652RU (MP+1): $8.05 (81 bb)
P9_238256HK (CO): $9.60 (96 bb)
P1_650602LI (BU): $9.20 (92 bb)
Hero (SB): $10.00 (100 bb)
P5_648372XV (BB): $9.70 (97 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.15) Hero (Hero) is SB with T♣ T♥
P6_522740NC (UTG) raises to $0.35, 4 players fold, Hero (SB) 3-bets to $1.50, 1 fold, P6_522740NC (UTG) calls $1.15

Flop: ($3.10) 3♣ 6♦ 7♠ (2 players)
Hero (SB) bets $2.60,

standard.


if you get re raised...ouch

I think once villain just calls your Cbet you can take AA KK QQ JJ out of their range and include most wheel suited aces and suited broadway as well as the occasional small pair (which has way less combos). 89 suited is possible and you have the blocker for 9T suited. I would still call a raise and evaluate on turn. Let's say turn is a J. Then i'd check call and evaluate again on river.

I think on this board I might have bet closer to $2.15. I think the smaller bet gets more hands to float. At $2.60 I'm not sure how many worse hands are going to call.

I agree. The board is semi-dry, so I think a size closer to half-pot is more appropriate.

nice spot. I agree with Yacht67

V folded, and I thought "well damn, that wasn't good"