Quote:
Originally Posted by Brussels Sprout
Yes, we should construct ranges for the 2 players given their actions, run our equity versus both of those ranges and then compare that to the pot odds being offered on the call.
I've given SB two pair and the two lower sets as well as AK and AJ of spades
I've given UTG+1 a lot of flush draws plus AQ and KQ since he looks fishier
9%....I'll skip the pot odds bit
So yeah as JFTIII said....easy fold
You are giving FISH alot more credit than you should.
Alot of QX, alot of 8X and alot of 7X might be in their range and they are just being dumb. You have to be careful, its the second time I read a post where you construct ranges in a way that provides confirmation bias towards fold. I think you probably have a tendency to overfold.
Considering we are against two fish, I have top pair top kicker blocking top boat which would do this, and blocking a trapped ace. Considering we don't block the ace of spade I would shrug call and expect to lose a fair amount of time.
UTG+1 minraise range (all suited 2 gapers and maybe 3gapers and less):
XXss, XXcc, XXhh,XXdd,22+
UTG+1 call range (all suited 2 gapers and maybe 3gapers and less)
XXss, XXcc, XXhh, XXd,22+
BB call range same as UTG+1
Narrow down fish range to all value and all spade combos in equilab, and all QXs that hit (lets not even add the 7's or 8's for argument sake, which I have seen frequently at fish anywhere from 100NL to 500NL), and come back with equity numbers. Look how much of a call it is.
Last edited by julien.roy; 02-25-2018 at 04:11 AM.