Hi guys, haven't posted in a while. Had a slight loser over 600ish hands at NL2 today. Looking back at the hands where I lost, a theme emerges - raising donk bets of shortstackers liberally / generally being a bit station-ey against shortstackers.
I have historically raised a lot of donk bets, especially if I have some sort of draw and it's been profitable, but after today I was wondering if the situation changes a bit vs shortstackers. Here are some examples
Preflop: Hero is CO with Q J
2 folds, MP2 calls $0.02, MP3 folds, Hero raises to $0.09, BTN folds, SB calls $0.08, BB folds, MP2 calls $0.07
Flop: ($0.29) 6 K A (3 players)
SB bets $0.14, MP2 folds, Hero raises to $0.70, SB raises to $0.78 and is all-in, Hero calls $0.08
Turn: ($1.85) 3 (2 players, 1 is all-in) River: ($1.85) 8 (2 players, 1 is all-in)
Spoiler:
Results: $1.85 pot ($0.06 rake)
Final Board: 6 K A 3 8
SB showed A Q and won $1.79 ($0.92 net)
MP2 mucked and lost (-$0.09 net)
Hero showed Q J and lost (-$0.87 net)
Villain in the 1st hand was VPIP:22/PFR:14/3BPF:5 over about 70 hands, so I thought it was extremely plausible that he had Kx in his range, and that he would have likely 3bet AJ+, and I have some equity with the draw so I went for a semi-bluff. The bet looked so small that I thought it was likely a probe, but on later inspection I realised he was probably pot-committed already by that point. Just a bit spewy from me I guess.
Villain in the 2nd hand was VPIP:15/PFR:12. I just figure I'm beat by the turn here, but again on later inspection, perhaps this is a call vs shortstackers? I don't know. It's very plausible that he might play some mid-pairs in this fashion as well as KQ, KJ.
Your thoughts and analysis would be much appreciated.