Quote:
Originally Posted by ionutd
I think you will make a ton of mistakes if you base crucial decisions on what a stat shows you after 2-300 hands
you should prob stick to less tables if you just started out, you can't properly think things through on 6 tables
if you're looking for a simple, automatic solution to poker, there isn't one
everyone got better through thousands of hours of playing+studying
the only ppl I categorize are fish, the aggro and passive varieties get different colors as I play
You clearly aren't a fan of a HUD lol yeah I agree, you get better through thousands of hours of playing and studying. I know poker isn't a way to make quick, easy money. I work/study/play very hard to improve. Not taking advantage of a HUD is just giving other players who use it (and are competent) an edge over you. Anyone who uses a HUD should know what stats are most realiable for a given sample size.
I have no interest in sitting on one table, observing every move when playing online. There are other ways I'd rather spend my time. I'd rather store their information on a database for me to refer to. Live, I would, because there are people to chat to as opposed to sitting there alone, staring at a computer screen lol I'm completely pro HUD because I've noticed the impact it's had on my win rate.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk