excuse me if i don't understand this properly. I'm doing my best to understand this concept
Ok, so let's take another example to look if there is something i'm doing is right
i'm not taking into account other factors such as variable effect, table dynamics, other players etc..
Villains stats in that particulair position (UTG)
VPIP:16, PFR:13, 3-bet:5%, fold to 3-bet:16%, 4-bet: 16%
Pre Flop: ($0.07) Hero is MP with T
T
UTG raises to $0.17,
Hero raises to $0.48,
0.48/(0.48+0.24) = 66% of the times we need him to fold.
Vilain fold to 3-bet: 42%
his contr: 9.3% (58% of 42)
so when he opens he will continue 58% of the time after getting 3-bet. that's too much to make a 3-bet profitable, but... we have TT and have a
51% equity agianst him because he only continues with 88+, AJ+, KQ+, ATs+, KTs+, QJs+
so this makes a 3-bet profitable.
Ok, but if he 4-bet's ?
Villain 4-betr: 1.5% (16% of his contr)
this means he will 4-bets us with a 1.5% range ( QQ+ )
because he will stack off almost 100% of the time with QQ+ it's easy to say it's not profitable to shove because we are 4 to 1 dog against his range
(19% equity)
please help me where it needs
thx