Am I a fish on a heater?
05-09-2018
, 04:09 PM
TLDR: Casual/rec mtt'er here who has never played one single hand of 9 handed cash in 10 years online, until 2 weeks ago. Decided to start at the bottom and see what happened. TBH it has been unreal. I'm seeing things happen routinely that i saw players do in 2008. I realize that my 25/100bb is not going to stay there, but can some of you micro cash game grinders tell me if 15/100bb is attainable? And what can a winning 10nl player expect at 25nl? Hopefully 8/100bb ? What can this cash game noob expect? Gracias
[IMG]
[/IMG]
[IMG]
[/IMG]
05-10-2018
, 06:50 PM
Hi! I'm glad you're performing well and having more luck on Pokerstars (?) than most regs at the limit!
I did a database analysis on NL5 ZOOM Full Ring last year and people I considered good regs were making only 3bb/100 on average, while people I considered worse, more ABC regs, were making 2bb/100 average over a sample of 400k hands, but it could been because I was a 6bb/100 reg at the time and maybe getting a small edge on them so maybe lowering their winrate by a little
Big longterm winrates are achievable if you're a complete psycho /slash/ crusher, but for a typical winning player, they're less than you'd expect in today's ZOOM
I did a database analysis on NL5 ZOOM Full Ring last year and people I considered good regs were making only 3bb/100 on average, while people I considered worse, more ABC regs, were making 2bb/100 average over a sample of 400k hands, but it could been because I was a 6bb/100 reg at the time and maybe getting a small edge on them so maybe lowering their winrate by a little
Big longterm winrates are achievable if you're a complete psycho /slash/ crusher, but for a typical winning player, they're less than you'd expect in today's ZOOM
05-10-2018
, 07:22 PM
Quote:
Hi! I'm glad you're performing well and having more luck on Pokerstars (?) than most regs at the limit!
I did a database analysis on NL5 ZOOM Full Ring last year and people I considered good regs were making only 3bb/100 on average, while people I considered worse, more ABC regs, were making 2bb/100 average over a sample of 400k hands, but it could been because I was a 6bb/100 reg at the time and maybe getting a small edge on them so maybe lowering their winrate by a little
Big longterm winrates are achievable if you're a complete psycho /slash/ crusher, but for a typical winning player, they're less than you'd expect in today's ZOOM
I did a database analysis on NL5 ZOOM Full Ring last year and people I considered good regs were making only 3bb/100 on average, while people I considered worse, more ABC regs, were making 2bb/100 average over a sample of 400k hands, but it could been because I was a 6bb/100 reg at the time and maybe getting a small edge on them so maybe lowering their winrate by a little
Big longterm winrates are achievable if you're a complete psycho /slash/ crusher, but for a typical winning player, they're less than you'd expect in today's ZOOM