lol'd!

Also stupid to have obviously winning players in the list.


tbh, it would be far better to have a poll of who we think is the player that judges his skills to be far superior to what it actually is.... cause that way we end up getting a super cool ego gang bang in the thread

think hes pretty good tbh. frank/mayo probably elicited similar reactions with a style that most people find extremely frustrating to deal w/

so funny...
i heard rumors about guys knowing some stupid tracking sites.....
so this people told me that blinderos has 4bb/100 wr from nl100-nl600 and beats all the limits and micromamont has 5bb/100....
and on the other side those people told me that nikoe0 loses 0.6bb/100 from nl50-nl200!
just wondering cause if that would be true (which is def not cause we all know this site does not exist) it`s very funny that nikoe0 niminates blindEROS and micromamont. strange world this is

just saying....

ApOstaI or whatever his screename is...

LLLLLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLL

you guys are so funny!!!

have you guys seen the movie rounders? i think it starts with something like: 'if you cant spot the fish within a few minutes at your table, then you are the fish!
this seems to fit here very well itt

not saying i am something special or so, nothing to do with it. but its just funny that some guys call out some super crushers, just because they cant win hands vs them. but there are many regs with minus -2bb/100 or more playing 10/9/2... i think the award should be won by one of those players and not by players who make 100k a year, lol

shut up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LanCLS_hIo4

Quite funny that u call out players who are significantly stronger than u lol. Teh both might have a weird style but they win longterm with 3-5bb which makes them 2 of teh strongest regs currently playing 200...

to keep the spirit alive i nominate gutter23 and meleab for worst regs

i second that
i mean, i actually caught gutter bluffing at fr, what's up with that?

blinderos and password222 (I assume that's the other reg he's talking about) both crush hard and play great, unpredictable oddball poker. blinderos even moreso.
But hey, not everybody can be a tablecamping, rakeback farming nit!

also Leg7

cobrik ftw!

also think blinderos is very solid, altough when you look at 2008's poll and you see WCGRider you realize we're making progress haters-wise

I never said he isn't good, i know he has many years of experience and i respect him a lot. Though lately i see him spew raise a lot and not very succesfully.

I actually admit i'm not the greatest reg in the world, probably only marginal. That info may be right but i have to say that at nl50 i was very young and had a lot to learn. I have come a long way since then and the last half of 2013 i actually ran around 1.5bb/100 out the top of my head at nl200.

I kindaaa think that their huge winrates comes from the fact that they run insanely well. They always flop sets in 3bet pots, even call 4bets after 3betting 22 and flop a set, or they're all in on the turn with a draw and then hit every single time. Or for that matter checkraise the flop with a flushdraw, call a 3bet and then hit the turn. I just think that many plays they make aren't really profitable at all, they just make their hands.

My bad woolly thought u meant redacesfull. Yeh idunno i guess you guys are prob right. Maybe this is just my frustrations taking over my brain...

This is an absurd post.

You're basically saying that they have found a way to break the laws of mathematics that apply to everyone else. It is true that someone may HAVE ran well (past tense) but it's ridiculous to assume someone DOES run well.

In reality what you're probably seeing are some showdowns where they have been fortunate to hit some hands, while at other times they have forced you off your hand when they missed their draws. No doubt you're also slow playing some big hands which also only get to showdown if they don't improve. This gives a skewed impression of hitting their draws more often than they should. Add in some selective memory and you have a better explanation than what you suggest.

lol what a poast

what is dis for
but ye, 1followu is by far the worst reg even before micromamont whos the second worst. 3rd is tonnamunz the mongofische.

a hu hand of the worst:

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, €2.00 BB (3 handed) - PokerStars Converter Tool from http://flopturnriver.com

micromamont (Button) (€294.55)
SB (€89.46)
1followu (BB) (€200)

Preflop: 1followu is BB with 6, Q
micromamont raises to €4, 1 fold, 1followu calls €2

Flop: (€9) 9, 5, 7 (2 players)
1followu checks, micromamont bets €4, 1followu raises to €16, micromamont calls €12

Turn: (€41) 4 (2 players)
1followu bets €29.81, micromamont calls €29.81

River: (€100.62) 6 (2 players)
1followu bets €74.52, micromamont calls €74.52

Total pot: €249.66 | Rake: €1.25

Results below:
micromamont had J, J (one pair, Jacks).
1followu had 6, Q (one pair, sixes).
Outcome: micromamont won €248.41

include payback

80% solid game like...
20% spew and bluffing fish

Eskoteiro Brazil wins?

I wasn't saying they run well every day of their lives, just around the last couple of months and lately. Actually lately not that great just normally. I probably have been a bit too subjective and haven't been paying attention to the stuff they do right. They probably have great 2 and 3barreling skills and just very good postflop reads.

It wasn't my intention to randomly spew a bunch of hate in my first post, next time i'll choose my words more selectively. It's just that some plays they make really just baffles me. And i found this example. I also had a conversation with redacesfull about this hand via chat. Redacesfull had kings.


PokerStars Hand #113658546924: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2 USD) - 2014/03/22 16:15:40 CET [2014/03/22 11:15:40 ET]
Table 'Merga II' 9-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 2: Nikoe0 ($241.58 in chips)
Seat 3: sainaaMN ($367.64 in chips)
Seat 6: redacesfull ($334.94 in chips)
Seat 7: micromamont ($306.36 in chips)
Seat 9: wakeupfrog ($80 in chips)
redacesfull: posts small blind $1
micromamont: posts big blind $2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Nikoe0 [Kh 3h]
wakeupfrog: folds
Nikoe0: folds
sainaaMN: folds
redacesfull: raises $4 to $6
micromamont: raises $10 to $16
redacesfull: raises $24 to $40
micromamont: calls $24
*** FLOP *** [Jc 6c 2h]
redacesfull: bets $52
micromamont: calls $52
*** TURN *** [Jc 6c 2h] [5d]
redacesfull: checks
micromamont: bets $80
redacesfull: calls $80
*** RIVER *** [Jc 6c 2h 5d] [8s]
redacesfull: checks
micromamont: bets $134.36 and is all-in
redacesfull: calls $134.36
*** SHOW DOWN ***
micromamont: shows [2c 2d] (three of a kind, Deuces)
redacesfull: mucks hand
micromamont collected $609.92 from pot


This is exactly what i was talking about earlier. They do this kinda thing a lot. And i gotta ask is this type of play profitable? Does anyone do this? Because i remember that when i call 4bets IP or OOP with suited, connected type hands and crack someone's big pair, they usually get mad at me and start calling me names through the chat. But that's better than calling with small pairs right? This table was full a few hands earlier but they do it too when it's full ring and even when they're not deep only 100bb. And IP and OOP.

But yeh if everyone disagrees with me and says they're solid regs then it's probably time for me to throw in the towel. I obviously didn't know they have the biggest winrates of 200nl so they must be doing a ton right. I get that now.

That's moar or less std 150bb deep when red 4betting too small. Especially once u know ur image and know red is never folding QQ+ when we hit...

Furthermoar a lot of micros money comes from hands which arent getting to showdown...

y u folding a sooted king in the CO?

Wuuut, they crush? I can understand password being a winner knowing how hard he table selects, but blinderos? He was just straight out most spazz-happy guy Ive ever seen (and Ive played with BrickT a lot!) as well as having a quite a few other glaring leaks. There's a chance Im confusing him with someone else but most likely not.
Oh and password def. doesnt play "unpredictable" poker, not even close to that.

Or I as always suck at pokers so meh, w/e.