Quote:
Originally Posted by Gospy
And for the last time, this is lol false. Learn maths.
So you're claiming that one of the absolute most difficult things for a ranking system to do (figure out if 2 players are "equally skilled"), and the whole point of all of them, which they all do pretty poorly with small numbers of games, is "not complicated" to apply to an entire group of 100 players?
Oh and hey look, I just got promoted to 4v4 diamond. It looks like this division has been under construction for a few days, which is not particularly surprising at this point in time, and there are 72 people so far. My win/loss ratio is 50-25, and it's taken a ridiculous number of games for my MMR to settle down enough to advance from silver to diamond, winning something like 28 of my last 35 games or something.
If it's really trying to put people in divisions based on approximate skill, everybody else in the division should be fairly comparable, right?
Or are you going to claim that the guys who have less than 50% win ratios who got placed in the same division are of similar skill to me?
Lets not ignore the fact that it took 70 games for the system to decide I wasn't really a silver player after I got unlucky with teammates in qualifications. *SEVENTY GAMES* to put me in a big wide-open classification group.
Yet you think this same system can somehow group players of similar skill, in a much narrower range, with a couple dozen games?
I'm not the one who needs to "learn maths" sir, nor am I the one trolling here. That's all you buddy.
Last edited by TNixon; 01-10-2011 at 02:32 AM.