Quote:
Originally Posted by loK2thabrain
I wish during comps they were required to fight until one side is completely destroyed. I know these players can tell when they don't have a chance, but on the other hand, I have a hard time believing that out of all the thousands (mirrions?) of quits not a single one would have ever came back.
Thoughts?
True to an extent. Some pros tend to give it all they've got until their last marine falls like Boxer, and yes once in a blue moon he will win a game because of it.
On the other hand you have players who will gg sometimes even in winning situations, for example idra (
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0nDsBOzeA4 ) watch that video, lol.
Some people tend to not want to fight an almost unwinnable situation, especially in tournaments because it is really tiring, and they just want to focus on the next game. and they don't see the potential risk of playing the next game worse because of the previous lengthy game for the "1 in a million" win
I think forcing for every building to be destroyed to win a game wouldn't work, even on ladder it could be extremely annoying