Quote:
Originally Posted by ianlippert
I dunno I found general poker theory much more informative when I was learning poker than I did for general magic theory. I feel like poker theory gave me tools that I could apply when I deemed them necessary, magic theory seems like a bunch of isolated strategy advice and when it is general it is too vague to use. I think that's just because in poker you face more of the same situations so it's more amenable to a general theory.
I think there's a lot to be said for general magic theory when it comes to the stuff that makes the game tick - card advantage, tempo, mana utility, flexibility and power vs. consistency, etc.
The thing is that like poker, a lot of people playing don't want to take the long road of understanding what makes the game work and what makes winning decks win, they just want to find out what best deck/best cards are and play them.
The market fills that desire accordingly.