Clash of Clans - Page 244 - Video Games - Video Game Systems Forum

Two Plus Two Forums Sports and Games Video Games

Clash of Clans

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 244 of 330

First

44 144 194 224 234 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 254 264 294

Last

Page 244 of 330

First

44 144 194 224 234 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 254 264 294

Last

08-11-2015 , 07:06 PM

#6076

happyhappy...

adept

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 906

Yeah but infernos and spells is the concern.

Quote

08-11-2015 , 07:08 PM

#6077

Richard Parker

banned

Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 13,949

Rushed offense doesn't work against matchup - something I can say with certainty.

So when I have 6 extra TH10 with max lavaloons to attack and I am a decent attacker, it is pretty hard to beat my clan.

Unfortunately we can't find enough reliable players to fill more than 30 players for war, we often end up neutralizing our own advantage by warring with just 25 or even 20.

Quote

08-11-2015 , 07:09 PM

#6078

Richard Parker

banned

Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 13,949

Quote:

Originally Posted by happyhappy...

Yeah but infernos and spells is the concern.

That's the thing I am asking. System might see the two the same, but obviously they're not because of infernos and extra spell.

Quote

08-11-2015 , 07:10 PM

#6079

happyhappy...

adept

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 906

I guess our question is more about the offense+added spells+one certain d.

4/5 builders vs 1 lab means us being behind this 'offense in war being optimal' curve feels hopeless moving forward.

Quote

08-11-2015 , 07:12 PM

#6080

happyhappy...

adept

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 906

As someone stated: 'the clan culture that any idle builder is a sin'

Quote

08-11-2015 , 07:14 PM

#6081

happyhappy...

adept

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 906

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard Parker

This is what we're realizing. So given our defensive curve, we're ****ed?

Eta: just comprehended the neutralization comment...

Suggestions?

Quote

08-11-2015 , 07:16 PM

#6082

Richard Parker

banned

Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 13,949

Without my seconds, we probably would flip 80% of our wins to losses.

So I would say so.

Either you guys get bunch of low weight seconds, or figure out a way for your tops to all of sudden learn how to attack.

Quote

08-11-2015 , 07:16 PM

#6083

happyhappy...

adept

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 906

Sweet

Quote

08-11-2015 , 07:17 PM

#6084

happyhappy...

adept

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 906

Create second accounts and rotate defensive first accounts out of war?

Last edited by happyhappy...; 08-11-2015 at 07:18 PM. Reason: And lose lives in the process?

Quote

08-11-2015 , 07:19 PM

#6085

happyhappy...

adept

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 906

Haha, Ty Richard.

Quote

08-11-2015 , 07:28 PM

#6086

happyhappy...

adept

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 906

On the bright side, at least deploying troops isn't a problem.

Quote

08-11-2015 , 07:30 PM

#6087

Tha Villain

grinder

Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 605

Quote:

Originally Posted by happyhappy...

us being behind this 'offense in war being optimal' curve feels hopeless moving forward.

Where were you guys during the TH 8.5/9.5 craze?

I'll say once I went to 8.5 I stomped my matchup most wars and often had to attack higher due to clan ineptitude (barch raids in war, mass dragons on th9 for 1*, etc.).

Then they whined until I built X Bows because "OMG why go to th9 and not build X Bows???" and my mirror has been much tougher ever since.

Quote

08-11-2015 , 07:34 PM

#6088

Tha Villain

grinder

Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 605

This matchup is weird though, supposedly as soon as you build X Bows or ITs you stop getting matched with th8 and th9, respectively. Or even brand new th9 and th10 without XB/IT. I dunno how this happened. Maybe because their walls are th7 and most of their lower th10's AD/WT look like th7 level too...

Quote

08-11-2015 , 07:36 PM

#6089

Richard Parker

banned

Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 13,949

I have 3 TH10's ranked below TH7 lvl 53, one just above it and below TH8 lvl 72.

In other words, I can 3-star anyone around me without using spells.

Quote

08-11-2015 , 07:43 PM

#6090

Richard Parker

banned

Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 13,949

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tha Villain

My seconds would eat those TH10's for lunch.

I guess problem is that you guys need people who can 3-star TH9's and low TH10's.

Quote

08-11-2015 , 07:52 PM

#6091

happyhappy...

adept

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 906

If you up to join our clan for a minute and just look around, it'd be appreciated.

Quote

08-11-2015 , 08:02 PM

#6092

Richard Parker

banned

Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 13,949

Open the clan.

Got time, just playing pokah.

Quote

08-11-2015 , 08:06 PM

#6093

happyhappy...

adept

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 906

Done

Quote

08-11-2015 , 08:23 PM

#6094

happyhappy...

adept

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 906

See your clan name and flag but can't find it in search

Quote

08-11-2015 , 08:25 PM

#6095

Richard Parker

banned

Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 13,949

Search again. It's invite only now.

Quote

08-11-2015 , 08:26 PM

#6096

happyhappy...

adept

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 906

Thx

Quote

08-11-2015 , 08:30 PM

#6097

Richard Parker

banned

Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 13,949

As you can see, I pretty much keep us in the war single handily. lol

Quote

08-11-2015 , 08:46 PM

#6098

happyhappy...

adept

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 906

Yeah, that's something. An eye opener for sure.

Quote

08-12-2015 , 01:02 AM

#6099

Dutch101

veteran

Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 2,031

Did our search ran for a long time because this clan is just unlikely to find a fair matchup so eventually they get matched with a close enough clan that also has been searching for a while.

Their bottom 6 TH10's have no maxed DE troops except hogs so they are unlikely to 3 star our TH9's so the war will get decided the same way as most times which is the amount of stars in the top 5.