Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Clash of Clans Clash of Clans

01-30-2015 , 02:01 PM
Wish i could boost this dentist appt
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 02:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve1238
Wish i could boost this dentist appt
Pure gold
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 03:50 PM
Just completed the Richard Parker challenge. 25,235 net dark elixir gained (minus whatever my drills produced in that period). 45 attacks. Every attack was +de.

I did cheat a little, boosted all barracks, 1 barb, 3 archer, 2 minion. So I had 1 barracks on 1s barbs. Also boosted heros and spell factory.

Bases were terrible, so much larger amounts are possible imo. I only had 5 th snipes, and 0 bases with collectors full or even remotely full.
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 03:58 PM
Confirmed RP is right.. entire thread will be burned now
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 04:16 PM
Don't think anyone said 20k DE wasn't doable. The argument we said wasn't doable or nearly impossible was the 40 attacks in an hour
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 04:18 PM
Fwiw, it was never my challenge...I knew it was possible so I offered up free quality tips to the poor guy looking for quicker way to get DE, not once but twice.

Both times the guy hit me back with some sort of insult because "you don't tell me what to do unless you're nice!"

And btw, reed has an advantage with 240 camps and maxed troops, plus he's getting a small boost even if he's not gemming barrack for barbs. Barbs are 5x faster during the special, instead of 4x with boost.

Anyhow, again, the point was that "you can raid down from crystal 2 for 20k DE in a boost."

And btw, I was not "lying" about leaving (and why the hell does that even matter?) because I was a butt hurt GF, it was more like I thought you guys were getting too emotional over my responses...

But who cares, big fat liar is "leaving" again.
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 04:24 PM
And it shall go on...

Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkFanIA
Don't think anyone said 20k DE wasn't doable. The argument we said wasn't doable or nearly impossible was the 40 attacks in an hour
FWIW, it's pretty black and white how this whole thing was started:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Westley
Dude in our clan claimed 20k DE was possible in a 2hr boost in Crystal ll... I called BS and probably came across as a dik/nit. But stand by my opinion!


Think I'll hang around G2-C3..see how we go..
So now you're basically completely shifting the goal line by saying that 40 attacks was somehow the main criteria, not 20k DE?

After m_reed has proven it, are you going to shift it again by saying BARCH with 40 attacks is the new criteria, because you sort of already did...

Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkFanIA
Wow you where talking about barch ing IN THE GAME WHEN WE WHERE ARGUING. Move along you inbred idiot
Alright, go ahead, Dr. Banner, you go...
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 04:36 PM
Not to break up this AIDs-fest, but have a lavaloonian question.

What makes a base more/less attractive to this attack? My logic has me thinking that super-centralized AD makes lavaloonian harder, is that right? Or is it opposite, since hounds tank for longer and loons clean up all the other defenses.

Also, what is standard timing for dropping hounds and loons? I have seen people drop the 4 hounds 1st and loons behind, but also seen the opposite with the idea being the hounds catch up to loons and all get raged at the same time.

Just feel like I am terribad at this attack and making sure I am thinking about it right. ty ty
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 04:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by optionality
What makes a base more/less attractive to this attack? My logic has me thinking that super-centralized AD makes lavaloonian harder, is that right? Or is it opposite, since hounds tank for longer and loons clean up all the other defenses.
Not an expert, but my thought would be that when they're too centralized, it is actually very easy to just focus in from the weakest side to get hounds and balloons to the middle, then it's pretty much game over.
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 04:44 PM
I kind of agree! so does that mean that non-centralized AD actually make lavaloonian harder? So maybe something like a HOLOWIWI would be better vs those bases??

besides the standard GOXXXXX, what other war attacks should i be considering as a near-max th9 taking on other max th9s in war?
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 04:47 PM
He left and is back again. ShockeR.
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 04:47 PM
You're sort of shifting the subject. Are we still talking about defending?
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 04:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkFanIA
He left and is back again. ShockeR.
How old are you?
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Parker
You're sort of shifting the subject. Are we still talking about defending?
nah, my bad, wasn't clear. I care about attacking. 1st question was meant to be about my lavaloonian attack strategy, just worded it poorly
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Parker
And it shall go on...



FWIW, it's pretty black and white how this whole thing was started:



So now you're basically completely shifting the goal line by saying that 40 attacks was somehow the main criteria, not 20k DE?

After m_reed has proven it, are you going to shift it again by saying BARCH with 40 attacks is the new criteria, because you sort of already did...



Alright, go ahead, Dr. Banner, you go...
You do know that I'm not wes correct? We are different people. I entered the argument in the game at a different point than he did. At no point in game or in this thread have I ever discussed how much DE can be done on Boost. In the game and in this thread my one and ONLY argument about all of this was that 40 attacks in an boost was pretty much impossible. Keep using something someone else said as words that I supposedly said tho.
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 04:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkFanIA
You do know that I'm not wes correct? We are different people. I entered the argument in the game at a different point than he did. At no point in game or in this thread have I ever discussed how much DE can be done on Boost. In the game and in this thread my one and ONLY argument about all of this was that 40 attacks in an boost was pretty much impossible. Keep using something someone else said as words that I supposedly said tho.
Ya...so how old are you again?

And did you not see m_reed's post earlier? Do you still want to argue whether 40 attacks in a boost is possible?
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 05:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by optionality
nah, my bad, wasn't clear. I care about attacking. 1st question was meant to be about my lavaloonian attack strategy, just worded it poorly
Beyond my realm. I am still a GO guy.
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 05:02 PM
Good lord this thread is aids. I'm gonna be the bigger person here and drop this. Congrats to Matt who actually did what he said he was going to attempt.
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 05:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by optionality
I kind of agree! so does that mean that non-centralized AD actually make lavaloonian harder? So maybe something like a HOLOWIWI would be better vs those bases??

besides the standard GOXXXXX, what other war attacks should i be considering as a near-max th9 taking on other max th9s in war?
My farm base has ADs near edge and got crushed by lavoonian. He used 2 small batches of loons to kill 2 AD then released the hounds and rest on others.

Pretty sure the goal is for no central ad, maybe Matt would know. Also, maybe it can be successful on both depending on how you drop.
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 05:28 PM
Depends whether you are talking about trying to get 2 star vs th10 or 3 star vs th9. I usually am against th10 and trying only for 2 star so I would much rather have ads near the outside so I can take out 2 quick and ignore the other 2. Also inferno placement is important. If I can freeze infernos with ads or with AQ or cc that is also a big plus. Not real sure what is better when trying to 3 star th9 but id still guess id rather have them spread out, take out 2 real quick, then launch all out attack on other 2. Also I almost never use 4 hounds anymore.

The worst to attack imo is kind of the middle ground. Where they are centralized enough that you cant get to any to take out quick, and you cant attack any without getting hit by others, yet there is still enough space to make taking them all out difficult.
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 05:30 PM
WP Matt appears I was wrong...

Came round to the 20k DE being possible fairly early on.. But was thinking 40 attacks with a star or 50% seems impossible as the win bonus was mentioned as a big part of the calcs.

But again, hold my hands up, I was wrong..

Can we cure the aids now?
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 05:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkoPolo
Also, maybe it can be successful on both depending on how you drop.
I was kind of thinking this too...

thx Matt, ya def looking to 3* top th9s. I feel like taking the expectation from 2 to 3 stars is difficult (for me at least).

last time i took 3 rage, 1 lightning for cc. I think the lightning could be a huge leak, and a proper lure to save the extra spot for a heal could be a big improvement. But luring with air troops is not something i have ever done. running experiments every war doesn't seem fair to everyone else either, esp in close wars.
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 05:53 PM
I wish Sunday would get here so i could get my gems from Omar. I want to get my aq to 15. Hoping it will be enough
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 05:54 PM
Read through thread, now I have cancer. Thanks guys
Clash of Clans Quote
01-30-2015 , 08:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerface21
o man this is great i dont even play coc i just come in here to see the on going war between dickie parker and others. i love you dickie your the man
[ ] your
Clash of Clans Quote

      
m