Quote:
Originally Posted by hackers238
Choose one (and a short explanation if you're up to it):
Moving up / Multitabling
3bet / coldcall IO hands IP
limp / raise small PP UTG (NL100 and below ldo)
posting / replying (HH)
Posting in the CO / Waiting till your BB
PT3 / were smart and waited
experience / study
+EV / No Variance
Thanks for doing this Rapid, I loved your recent "Play a hand against me Deep" post
I'd have to go with multi-tabling, only because my concern is more with hourly rate than ptbb/100. However, once you've established that you're beating a level pretty badly and are well-rolled for the next one, it's definitely +EV to move up.
Is it bad that I don't know what IO hands means? If we're talking about things like SCs and small PPs, it depends on the villain, position and stack sizes. (I keep going back to stack size for obv reasons lol), but I'm usually either folding or calling without a good read on villain.
I've done both and would definitely say...it depends. LOL At smaller stakes where you have more people calling pre and less people folding postflop, I think it's slightly more +EV (and certainly lower variance) to limp these. I don't think there are enough people paying attention to your EP raising range to justify widening it. JMHO though.
FTR, I do still raise them when I play 50.
I like both, but tend to lean towards posting, just because I can get in depth about my own thought process, where as in responding (unless the thread is content-rich) there's not enough information to really develop a thought process I'm confident in. It sucks to be readless, for sure and there is definitely something to be said for being able to play readless, but even then, we fall back on some "general, random XXNL villain" Which will vary based on limits.
I almost always post from the BB, but I think it's more habit than anything. I also feel like I'll be tempted to steal with ATC without knowing the blinds' tendencies.
I still use PT2 and like it a lot. I'll eventually try PT3, for sure, but also know they need to work on some stuff.
I'd have to say experience...there are so many intangibles that study just won't teach you. Studying, however, provides a frame for multiple aspects of the game, and understanding the frame can help make decisions much easier. (Studying also helps you get in-depth about the "why" of the decisions, as opposed to the "what" and both are very important, imo)
I'd say +EV, but I don't play underrolled and I feel comfortable moving down if I need to. If this isn't the case, I'd lean more towards low variance, at least until BR management issues are under control.
Thanks! I really enjoyed posting it and feel that adjusting to stack sizes is something a lot of uNL players have trouble with (and I think it's something I think about a lot and may even overadjust for LOL)