Chip:
OK, you didn't set up the screenshots exactly as I would have liked, so I'm just going to analyze the three screenshots without particular regard to my previous post.
Screenshot 1: This screenshot discloses two issues in your game:
1. Your blind losses are a bit on the high side, really just in the BB. The second screenshot makes clear why this is happening, so I'll get to that in the next section.
2. Your early and middle position stats are very strange. It looks to me like your EP stats are HUGELY affected by variance. Your win rate there, WTSD and W$SD are all pretty insanely high. So it looks like you're running really hot in EP, and it's messing up your stats.
Your WTSD and W$SD make it look like you have a big leak in not getting value from your hands, because you win so often at showdown--like 60% of the time. But that number could also be explained by small sample variance, and your win rate certainly IS being affected by a lot of run good in EP (not all-in run good, just hitting hands, getting paid, that sort of thing). So I'm inclined to write that off as variance, tentatively. Keep an eye on it. Your win rate and your W$SD should booth come down significantly. If your W$SD doesn't start coming down into the low 50s, you should conclude you're not betting your hands appropriately.
Screenshot 2:
Cold calling in Position
As I said, this screen makes your cold calling leak super obvious. Assume, for the moment, that variance is not affecting your stats in this spot. Now look at your cut off win rate when you cold call. It's 220/100, which is very high. You cold called 391 hands from the CO. Now look at the button: You called 981 times, way more, and your win rate went from 220 to -62. What, other than variance, explains that? The simple answer is that the wider range introduced into your cold calling game a lot of starting hands that you're not cold calling profitably.
As we discussed in the previous posts, your fundamental problem OTB is that you're calling way too wide and folding way too often when you don't flop gin.
Now, I started with the assumption that your sample was not unduly affected by variance here. In fact, I know it is being affected by positive variance, which is bad news for you.
Your CO win rate is on the high side; I think it's unsustainably high, and you can expect it to come down over time. Unfortunately, your button win rate is a reasonable loss rate, that appears to be relatively variance free. It's very common to see people cold calling for a long term loss rate around -60bb/100. So we have no reason to believe that your sample is radically different than what your long term loss rate will be if you don't change your cold calling game.
Fortunately, changing our cold calling game is pretty easy, as it mostly entails folding preflop. Just go to the holecards report, and filter for the button only, and then filter for did cold call = true. Look at the hands that are negative. You'll probably see some things there that will shock you, but really should not. My guess is that you'll have a lot of calls with broadway hands, and that you'll be negative with that group. My guess is that you'll also be negative with the suited connectors and suited one gappers that are in your range.
Being negative with these hands is a completely standard leak. LOTS of people are negative with even a range of AK/AQ when they flat in position, simply because of the post flop mistakes they make. So you can't look at, for example, AQ showing up as negative cold calling OTB, and think "oh,I only have 22 calls here with AQ, that's just variance." It's actually more likely that you really are playing that hand for a loss if it shows up there.
The reason I am confident about that is because of your high fold to flop c-bet stat, which indicates a strong fit or fold tendency. That tendency is a leak when calling in position with unpaired cards, which may literally be impossible to play for a profit by playing fit or fold. If not impossible, it's at least very difficult.
So you may have no choice but to tighten up your cold calling game considerably by folding preflop those hand groupings that are unprofitable for you.
this is a temporary fix to stop the bleeding while you do tons of poker homework to learn how to better play these hands, and slowly work them back into your game in a very systematic way.
Cold calling from the blinds:
As I said under screen shot 1, you have a problem in the BB, and it turns out to be your cold calling game. You're actually not doing too badly--you're more or less break even with a medium-sized calling range.
Theoretically, when we're callin from the blinds, we want to find the widest possible range that we can call with and do better than the loss we incur when we fold the blind. So any win rate in the BB better than -1bb/hand is preferable to folding. So breaking even with your cold calling range actually isn't that bad. However, when we call with a reasonably tight range, we should expect to be able to achieve a higher overall win rate than when we cold call from the blinds with a really wide range.
What's going on in your BB win rate, is that you have a pretty tight range, but a win rate that's more appropriate to a really wide range. It is possible to win almost 1bb/hand 100bb/100 with your calling range.
What that means is that you're not getting enough value from a pretty strong range. Again, you want to go to your holecards report, filter for the blinds, and cold calls, and take a look at the hands that are losing money. I KNOW you're going to be shocked by what you see there.
Unfortunately, the answer here is not folding preflop. Folding from the button doesn't cost us anything, but folding from the blinds does. So, for example, if you have a -90bb/100 WR with KQo, you can't plug a BB leak by folding it and taking a -100bb/100 loss. But -90bb with KQ is a serious leak. So we have to work on plugging it. Again, it's a fit or fold problem, but there's no easy fix. It's just a lot of thinking about how best to play the hand, how to get more value with it when you're winning, how to lose less when you're losing, and how to win an occasional pot with air. It's hard.
Screen shot 3
3 betting in position:
You forgot to filter out the premiums (AK and QQ+) on this screen shot. But that's not a big deal, because it looks pretty obvious that there's a problem here.
My tentative conclusion is that the previous advice you received to open up your 3 betting in position has introduced a leak into your game. You win rate when you 3 bet in position is 83.7bb/100, including when you 3 bet your premiums. It's pretty likely, then, that when you filter out the premiums, your WR here will go negative. If that's the case, then opening up introduced a leak into your game. The reverse is also true; if your win rate does not go negative, it means there's a problem with your premiums. But that could just be variance.
If your win rate goes negative when you remove the premiums, and we establish that your opening up introduced a leak into your game, then:
1. That doesn't mean the advice was bad. It's just that there's a problem with your execution. The advice was actually theoretically correct, but was incorrect for you because of your tendency to play somewhat fit or fold (please don't take offense at that characterization, I'm just trying to be candid and help).
2. The actual leak could be several things, and likely is a combination of some. It's essentially impossible for me to diagnose the specific leaks without actually getting into your database and rooting around. But I will note that among micro stakes six max players, the problem is as often with their light value component as it is with their bluff component (bluffs are easier to play, after all
). It could be something as simple as 3 betting the right hands against the wrong villains, or it could be a subtle post flop leak.
3 bets from the blinds:
Eventually, you're going to need to open up your 3 betting from the blinds. Your WR here is sort of obscenely high, owing to the relative infrequency with which you 3 bet air. But we can't open up your 3 betting from the blinds until we figure out what the precise problems are with 3 betting on the button, and then fix those problems there, first.
That's about it for these 3 screenshots. I'm happy to continue helping.