Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
uNL Stats Checkup Thread uNL Stats Checkup Thread

12-07-2010 , 09:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by donkeyadmin
Thanks. I tend to do "super star" calldowns. And it seems to be costly.. Also i feel that my blind play is terrible. Any advice sir?
im terrible at reading these PT stats cause i never used PT but am i getting that your ATS is 42%? thats too high. just like the other guys i commented on at this i bet you're putting yourself in a bunch of marginal spots and you don't know what to do when you have tpgk or like mp+ straight draw or something idk. a lot of spots where you don't want to be in OOP for sure. try to play in position a lot more, your winrate is sure to go up a bit just from that.
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-07-2010 , 10:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajt8
im terrible at reading these PT stats cause i never used PT but am i getting that your ATS is 42%? thats too high. just like the other guys i commented on at this i bet you're putting yourself in a bunch of marginal spots and you don't know what to do when you have tpgk or like mp+ straight draw or something idk. a lot of spots where you don't want to be in OOP for sure. try to play in position a lot more, your winrate is sure to go up a bit just from that.
Whats a good stat to be aiming at ATS? I am aware that it is villain-dependant. But what's a good stat on average?
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-07-2010 , 11:01 PM
anywhere around 30% is probably near optimal. use basic logic to figure out if your opponent is smart enough to know you are bullying him, and be prepared to have the goods if he thinks that.

the important thing to get out of stealing is that you're not looking to build a pot or make call downs with marginal hands, make a stealing range you are comfortable with. think about the bottom line, $$
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-08-2010 , 08:46 AM
thanks ajt8.

What i meant with 2nd barreling was that if they call our cbet, and we have air, I profit more from just giving up rather than trying to 2nd barrel, cause they always call with anything that has sdv (in their eyes).

Here are my stats from NL5. From what I understand, the red line going downwards is normal in the micros?






uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-08-2010 , 12:03 PM
Hello, I've played a decent number of hands but am pretty much a break even player. This is me up only $300 after 33,315 hands playing 50nl rush poker (6max). If anyone is willing to help me out and analyze my game from these stats i would greatly appreciate it. If i should post all positional statistics let me know if that makes it easier to analyze. Thanks!

Hands: 33,315

VP$IP: 26.15

PFR: 19.81

CCPF: 9.38

Win%: 19.74

W$WSF: 42.37

Amount Blind: $4,189.00

Amount Won: $305.95

W$SD: 50.27

WTSD: 26.25

BB/100: .92

BB/Hour: 5.9
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-08-2010 , 07:53 PM
Can someone take a look at my stats? Thanks!

This stats are for 25nl SH.



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-08-2010 , 08:02 PM
Hi All

Would like some feedback on the graph and the stats if possible...I am currently winning at 10nl but I do suffer some swingy sessions, and my blue and red lines should be the opposite way around ...any advice welcome

thanks

[IMG][/IMG]

uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-08-2010 , 11:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaxyQ
thanks ajt8.

What i meant with 2nd barreling was that if they call our cbet, and we have air, I profit more from just giving up rather than trying to 2nd barrel, cause they always call with anything that has sdv (in their eyes).

Here are my stats from NL5. From what I understand, the red line going downwards is normal in the micros?

graphs
yes red line doesn't matter, it is just beginning to matter to me and i am about to move up to ssnl



look at your money lost in bb dude. wtf. stop overplaying your hands out of position and you'll probably do fine. look at your hands played like AJo and those type of hands and see how much money you have dumped off. do a little study and make some ranges for your self to call and 3b from each position, most importantly oop positions. this will help your game tremendously

and about your first comment, you're pretty much on target, but that doesn't mean there are not spots for you to drop 2 or 3 barrels. consider board texture, paired turns and rivers, potential and missed fd/sds, think about what you are trying to get out of the hands you play.

it takes some effort to win at poker, do work man
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-08-2010 , 11:39 PM
Hello, I've played a decent number of hands but am pretty much a break even player. This is me up only $300 after 33,315 hands playing 50nl rush poker (6max). If anyone is willing to help me out and analyze my game from these stats i would greatly appreciate it. If i should post all positional statistics let me know if that makes it easier to analyze. Thanks!

Hands: 33,315

VP$IP: 26.15

PFR: 19.81

CCPF: 9.38

Win%: 19.74

W$WSF: 42.37

Amount Blind: $4,189.00

Amount Won: $305.95

W$SD: 50.27

WTSD: 26.25

BB/100: .92

BB/Hour: 5.9
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-10-2010 , 11:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by yplay27
Hello, I've played a decent number of hands but am pretty much a break even player. This is me up only $300 after 33,315 hands playing 50nl rush poker (6max). If anyone is willing to help me out and analyze my game from these stats i would greatly appreciate it. If i should post all positional statistics let me know if that makes it easier to analyze. Thanks!

Hands: 33,315

VP$IP: 26.15

PFR: 19.81

CCPF: 9.38

Win%: 19.74

W$WSF: 42.37

Amount Blind: $4,189.00

Amount Won: $305.95

W$SD: 50.27

WTSD: 26.25

BB/100: .92

BB/Hour: 5.9
I dont play rush but from this meagre information, I feel like your VPIP/PFR gap needs to narrow - start 3betting a lot of hands youre calling with (especially OOP) - that will help push your WTSD below 25 which is the absolute max it should be and hopefully push up the W$SD bit as well. You give very little info about your post flop, I can only guess from the low W$SD that youre again calling more than you are raising (for value or bluff) on many streets, which is not gut.

Hope that helps
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-10-2010 , 11:20 AM
Now my turn



I know its not 10K, more around 3K which I think is more than enough, if you were one of my villians, for you to draw an accurate impression of my play.

All at 100NL Full Tilt 6 max. I've left out results (= winrate) because I want this to be viewed objectively, its not a brag because those things are a waste of time. Im actually not that happy with my results at the moment.

So, if you were at a table with me, which of these stats would jump out to you, what sorts of notes are you likely to have on me, and most interestingly how would you adjust your play vs me as compared to vs the average 100NL reg.

Thank you

Last edited by grinningco; 12-10-2010 at 11:26 AM.
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-11-2010 , 01:54 AM
I would think that your 3betting range has too many bluffs, because you have a 92% fold to 4bet, which means you're either 3bet/folding TT/JJ because you don't want to get them in pre, or you're just 3betting too many junk hands but flatting your AK/AQ's. I would 4bet you everytime that I had a Kx/Ax blocker.

You're also playing more from the SB than the BB (calling and 3betting more) which I'm sure is a leak.

Your fold cb to raise seems to be pretty low considering you're cbetting 64%, meaning you're peeling way too wide vs flop raises.

Your wtsd% is also 18%. I'd triple barrel you all day on boards that run out good. It's prob not a leak since your w$sd is high, but definitely something that you should consider, maybe you're not bluffcatching in good spots or something.
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-11-2010 , 01:16 PM
A friend of mine has really been struggling at NL50 recently. Here is his graph:



As you can see, he breaks even by winning a lot at showdown and losing it all in NSD pots. He mentioned that the last 5k hands have mainly been due to tilt with family issues etc - and when his blue line is flat, he just loses at the rate of his red line losses.

This guy clearly has some pretty big leaks - what are some of the most common leaks that might cause his red line to be so bad?

Here are his overall stats:



and stats by position:




Can you see any big glaring leaks?

A couple of things I can see:
  • should 3bet more on button
  • should 3bet more in BB vs SB steals
  • too tight when it folds to him in CO
  • probably a little too tight in general in fact
  • not aggressive enough on turn and river?
  • not stealing enough in SB

Anything else you guys can spot? What do you think would be the most common postflop leaks causing such a bad redline?

Cheers.
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-11-2010 , 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyncho
A friend of mine has really been struggling at NL50 recently. Here is his graph:
A couple of things I can see:
  • should 3bet more on button
  • should 3bet more in BB vs SB steals
  • too tight when it folds to him in CO
  • probably a little too tight in general in fact
  • not aggressive enough on turn and river?
  • not stealing enough in SB

Anything else you guys can spot? What do you think would be the most common postflop leaks causing such a bad redline?

Cheers.
Yup. Too tight. He's missing a lot of value. Funnily enough he also doesn't play back at 3bets enough. Usually it's otherway around but for 13 pfr he's folding ridiculously much to 3bets. cbet stats are also curiously low for such tight raisor.

Apart from that yeah that looks right. He needs to loosen up IP. Bit more steals from SB also helps though no need to go overboard. Button is primary steal position.

Your list seems to cover it up pretty well.
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-11-2010 , 03:16 PM
Your friend's WTSD is super low. He's getting barrelled off every single hand, he could look for spots to bluffcatch etc. His turn aggression and river aggression is also super low, he's probably not valuebetting thinly enough on rivers and so his SD winnings doesn't > NSD losses.

I think this points out that he probably has some river leaks where he either folds the best hand too often, or doesn't get max value when he does have the best hand.
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-11-2010 , 10:13 PM
I posted my graph and hands a while ago, and was asked to upload after a while again, so here are my new pics, appreciate all comments, if there are any small leaks, and what im doing good.









And also if anyone wants to trade hands at ongame, or get coached by me, PM me
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-12-2010 , 11:07 AM
Any comments would be helpful =]





uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-12-2010 , 11:11 PM
Hey i know that this is a very small sample but can anyone inver anything from my stats. Its all 25NL 6max some short handed.

uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-13-2010 , 12:41 AM
hello all,

i just purchased HEM and converted all my hands from this year. i want to focus on 50nl 6m since that is what i play the most of so i crossed out the rest (i may be dumb but i don't see a way to filter by stakes etc. in the "Reports" section? i can only see a filter for the graphs section).

is there anything that sticks out in my stats? if it makes any difference, probably 70-80% of these hands are played at the 20-50bb tables on stars (always buying in for max). this is for a little over 200k hands btw.









i'm really clueless with stats so if i should be posting different stats, graphs, etc. or whatever please let me know.
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-13-2010 , 12:59 AM
holy crap i kind of ****ed those pics up lol oops

also i know everyone loses from the blinds but what is a reasonable range for "loss rate" from SB/BB respectively?
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-14-2010 , 01:53 AM
can someone please tell me how to check in HEM if im spewing money in 3bet pots?

not sure how to do it =/
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-14-2010 , 09:59 AM
Can someone please tell me what the redline is all about i thought it was a good thing to have it going up in a nice line but just after reading this is not good at the micros?
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-14-2010 , 01:16 PM
Its the nature of the game. At the lower stakes your going to be playing bad people who get in like 99 pre flop for 250 BBs. So all your money comes from playing pretty straightforward in micros. Where as in like 2/4+ where most people are regs and know what theyre doing (or somewhat ateast) you get your money from outplaying them and not showing so many hands down.
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-14-2010 , 03:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard88
Can someone please tell me what the redline is all about i thought it was a good thing to have it going up in a nice line but just after reading this is not good at the micros?
If you want to check ANY 3-bet pots:
Go to Reports, Filters on top right, Edit.
On the Main Filters Tab, select "Position of Three Bet" and check them (all if you don't care where the 3b was)
Go to More Filters Tab, on the right double click "VPIP = True"

If you want more positional stuff, clear all the above filters.
In the Main Filters Tab, check and uncheck the "Position" checkboxes to filter the hands where you were in one of the checked positions
In More Filters Tab, add PFR=True and Faced Preflop 3 Bet = True
- If you want to also pin down position of the 3-bettor, go to the Main Filters Tab and select the appropriate "Position of Three Bet"

If you want yourself as 3-bettor:
Main Filters Tab, check appropriate "Position" checkboxes.
More Filters Tab, add Did 3Bet = True

As you can see, it's pretty open ended in terms of what you can do. Hopefully the above examples show you the basic templates, on which you can then build to narrow down the scenarios you want to analyze. For starters, you can filter out Hole Cards. or in Board Texture Tab see how you do on A-high flops, etc.
uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote
12-15-2010 , 10:57 AM
I wanted to compare two very small sessions, one with marginal amount won & one lost. Is there something I'm blatantly doing differently in the two? Or is the sample size too small to even bother trying to compare and it could just be attributed to going through a spot of getting better hands? These are two sessions a little under 2 hours each. Would comparing 2 sessions 4-5 hours long with each other be any better or are they still too small of sample sessions to be worth comparing?



uNL Stats Checkup Thread Quote

      
m