Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading.

11-15-2007 , 07:36 PM
Quote:
Quote:
Say a player has a VPIP of 40% and a PFR of 20% and they limp in front of you. What sort of holdings do you expect them to have? Well, we know the player is willing to play with 40% of his hands; our sample range for this looked something like "any pair, any ace, any king, any two broadway, any suited connectors 32s+." But we can already refine this range some more: we know that with 20% of those hands, villain would have raised, and here he didn't.
Since no one mentioned this earlier. Isn't this wrong. Doesn't he mean he raises 20% OF ALL HANDS, and not 20% of just the hands he plays?

Just want make sure. It doesn't change the point he's making but I need to know if I am mistaken.
You're correct, but it was only bad wording. If you read the very next section it says:

Quote:

If we assume that villain raises with his top 20%, our sample range for that looks something like "any pair, any two broadway, any suited ace." So take THOSE hands out of his current range....

In other words, what I meant was "he's playing 40% of his hands, he's raising 20% of his hands, and he limped here. That means he probably has a hand in the top 40% but NOT the top 20%." I go on to explain roughly what that range looks like.
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
11-15-2007 , 08:30 PM
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Say a player has a VPIP of 40% and a PFR of 20% and they limp in front of you. What sort of holdings do you expect them to have? Well, we know the player is willing to play with 40% of his hands; our sample range for this looked something like "any pair, any ace, any king, any two broadway, any suited connectors 32s+." But we can already refine this range some more: we know that with 20% of those hands, villain would have raised, and here he didn't.
Since no one mentioned this earlier. Isn't this wrong. Doesn't he mean he raises 20% OF ALL HANDS, and not 20% of just the hands he plays?

Just want make sure. It doesn't change the point he's making but I need to know if I am mistaken.
You're correct, but it was only bad wording. If you read the very next section it says:

Quote:

If we assume that villain raises with his top 20%, our sample range for that looks something like "any pair, any two broadway, any suited ace." So take THOSE hands out of his current range....

In other words, what I meant was "he's playing 40% of his hands, he's raising 20% of his hands, and he limped here. That means he probably has a hand in the top 40% but NOT the top 20%." I go on to explain roughly what that range looks like.
Pokey, I've always wondered if you actually read hands like this.

I haven't seen anyone who knows what 28% of hands looks like off the top of their head or knows what a 19/10 might be limping in with by using the difference between the numbers.
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
11-16-2007 , 02:20 PM
This is the best strategy/make-you-think kind of thread I've read in months! (it could have something to do with the fact that the two main forums I read are NVG and B&M, but nonetheless it's still the best I've read in a while!)

Seriously though, thanks Pokey for posting this, I bookmarked it to read again in the future.

benny
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
11-20-2007 , 05:41 PM
Super!
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
11-20-2007 , 05:57 PM
I've only been on 2+2 time for a short time now, but stuff like this is what is making me addicted! Thank you Pokey! This stuff is amazing, just genius. Thank you for this contribution. I am now going to search for everything else you
've ever posted lol
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
11-23-2007 , 09:28 PM
ninja bump
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
10-11-2008 , 01:47 PM
jeet kun do bump
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
10-11-2008 , 01:56 PM
I think it's time to read this again... god i love pokey.
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
10-28-2008 , 05:29 PM
Wow I am really Glad that someone just recently bump this! Great Post pokey, Very insightful. I've been wondering lately just how "readable" I am and now replaying a few hands in my head, it makes sense why i lost at showdown. Thanks Again pokey.
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
10-29-2008 , 09:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZaneKinetic
I think it's time to read this again... god i love pokey.
you *******
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
10-29-2008 , 10:35 AM
Epic bump imo. Tyvm.
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
10-30-2008 , 03:59 PM
I don't know why someone would take so much time and effort to write this, but I'm glad you did.

Didn't realise how bad I was at this until studied this a bit.

Thanks a mill
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
01-02-2009 , 12:09 AM
Great post.
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
02-23-2009 , 08:06 AM
Single most informative post I've read on this site thus far.
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
02-23-2009 , 09:55 AM
Do any other winning, thinking players disagree with a decent amount of OP's assertions? I guess the general stuff he says is ok, but the logic he uses to support his theories is pretty terrible.

nevermind.......if this is for full-ring then it makes alot more sense

Last edited by nolebeezy; 02-23-2009 at 09:56 AM. Reason: thought it was for 6max
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
03-02-2009 , 05:53 AM
thx for that
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
03-02-2009 , 07:14 AM
Nice post.

Pokey, (or others): Was Sklansky wrong when saying zero level thinking is when you only think about your hand?
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
03-02-2009 , 10:37 AM
Well written, as usual. Thanks Pokey.
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
03-02-2009 , 10:41 AM
truly sick bump, Gtpitch would even be proud

Thanks pokey
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
04-22-2009 , 12:57 PM
Great post, thanks!
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
07-18-2009 , 08:58 PM
Just read it, good post.
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
07-18-2009 , 10:19 PM
Havent seen this one in a long time
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
09-06-2009 , 06:27 PM
Thanks Pokey. Steller post man.
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
10-25-2011 , 03:24 PM
I need to bump it just to thanks Pokey !!!

bye
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote
10-25-2011 , 03:29 PM
epic thread bump
An Unbelievably Long Guide to Hand-Reading. Quote

      
m