Originally Posted by JackAll
Big deal if we win the pot. We are ahead of all hands that fold, who often have 3-4 outs at best. Why do we need to win it against hands we are way ahead of?
I don't think people call enough with weaker hands with an A on the board to warrant a value bet.
This is not correct. If we check flop, it costs us the same against an Ace, but we also get money from bluffs. This is a big difference. Think about it. I suspect it may take a while for you to understand. Possibly the rest of your life.
Betting for info. That's pretty clever. Almost as good as raising for info. wtf.
Who gives a crap about gaining control of this particular hand. Don't add nonsensical reasons to get people to come around to what you believe.
And who cares if we get 2 free cards. We have 5 outs. That is d!ck all. And he may check turn if we check flop also giving us a second free card.
K2-K9, Q2-Q9 do not pay for a draw. Honestly - wtf?
The last 2 hands are drawing to 10 outs, and will only fold turn if we double barell, which we won't. So they get 2 free cards with 10 outs to beat us. This is a god forsaken reason to bet the flop. In fact, this is a stronger reason to not bet the flop.
Lol. Nice work genius.
What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
You posted a hand for review.
I spent time constructing a post containing my thoughts on said hand.
At no point was I rude, or derogeratory, I simply tried to help. I thought that's why you posted the hand. Most people don't go to the effort of posting hands they feel they played perfectly.
Your reply was rude and uncalled for.