Your stats look pretty damn solid. I have a few nit picks, but you need to understand up front that I am recommending only very small adjustments to your game--I don't want you to make any really significant changes at all:
1. Big Blind: your loss rate is -0.21ptbb/hand. This is actually NOT a leak, but you have some room to improve here. I want you to defend a little more than you do right now. Pay a lot of attention to the stealer's ATS% and start defending with the top of his range. If the CO or button raises first in and has a high ATS%, say 30%, you can call or 3 bet, say, the top 1/2 of his range. You have to keep in mind that you will be OOP, which is a disadvantage, so you compensate by folding the bottom half of his range. If you do this, you will, on average, be calling or 3 betting with a better hand than the stealer has. If you learn how to not play strictly fit or fold in defending, you will be able to show a profit in these situations.
2. Small Blind: Again, your SB play is NOT a leak, but it is an obvious area where you have room for improvement. Make sure you are raising first in about 40% of the time. You don't need to defend your SB as aggressively as you do the BB, but you should still be willing to defend against LP apparent steals.
3. W$WSF: This is a medium size leak in post flop play. Yours is on the low side at 35%. I suspect a major reason for this is because you are not contending for orphan limped pots. In a 3 way pot, in either blind, fire a bet pretty much any time you flop a pair, a draw or you have two overs to the flop. Usually bet again on the turn, but evaluate the board texture and the villain ranges before you do. But when you flop any pair or draw or overs, you should ASSUME that you are going to lead the flop AND the turn, unless you have a compelling reason not to. If the pot is 4 way, drop the worst hands, but fire good draws and good pairs, again, planning to bet the turn a lot of the time, but not assuming that will be the case nearly as often as when the pot is 3 way.
You should also look for other situations where you are potentially folding the best hand, because 35% is too low a W$WSF% for a TAg, and it indicates a slight propensity to play fit or fold outside of the blinds.
4. CC%: This really relates to your W$WSF. Your cold calling percentages are on the high side in late position. In and of themselves, these CC%s are fine. But combined with a low W$WSF, there is a high probability that you are losing money in some of the cold calling spots where you could be playing them for a profit. So look through your DB; filter for the hands you cold call--look at your LP win rates with suited connectors, ragged aces and small pocket pairs, for example. Look at each category individually. They should all be profitable. If they are not, you may be leaking. If you are leaking, I suspect that it is a slight propensity, as I described above, to give up on the hand when you miss. Most of the time this is the correct play, but sometimes you should make a play at the pot. You need to be alert for these possibilities. So, for example, if UTG raises and MP2 calls, and you call OTB with JTs, and the flop comes down A92r and it is checked to you, you should normally bet. A 2/3 pot bet needs to work about 40% of the time you fire it to show a small profit, and you will probably get folds at least that often.
5. Fold to C-Bet: At 79%, your fold to c-bet % is a leak. In theory, your opponents can profitably c-bet you with any two cards every time you steal, and show a profit. When you will have position post flop, you should consider 4 betting or calling
a bit more than you currently do. Bear in mind that when you call or 4 bet a 3 bet, your goal is not necessarily to make a profit, it is to mitigate your losses. Suppose we classify all of your calls of a 3 bet as "steal defense," and we exclude your best premium hands from that category (AK and QQ+). Our goal in our steal defense play is not to show a profit, it is to lose less than your average steal per hand. So if you steal on the CO and the button with 3bb, and you fold to a 3 bet, you take a 3bb/hand loss. Therefore, your "steal defense strategy" is profitable if, on average, you lose less than 3bb/hand when you defend your steal. Showing a profit in your "steal defense" plays is nice, but not necessary to having a successful strategy--all you really have to do here is successfully mitigate your losses.
This, however, is hard to do. You should ease into it. For instance, if you are currently folding AQo when you raise with it in LP and are 3 bet out of the blinds, you can start calling 3 bets from the loosest 3 bettors. If this goes well, add another couple of hands. Your goal is not to radically change your fold to 3 bet%, it is to get it down slightly, say, to 68% or so.
6. WTSD%: at 21%, you are a bit low. It looks like this is primarily a function of your tightness in the blinds, as your SD%s are really low in both of those positions. So I expect changing your blind play will improve this number.
7. W$SD. At 56%, you are a bit on the high side. I don't like to see a big gap between WTSD% and W$SD--it makes me think you are playing weak tight a bit too often. Again, I suspect that this is mostly a function of your blind play and maybe your cold calling hands. You should track this gap as you make the changes I have recommended, and look for it to close some--say, from 21/56 to 24/53.
I want to reiterate the important point I made at the beginning: Your stats are really solid as they are. Despite the fact that I pointed out a few things you should be doing differently, these are changes at the margins of your play. You should not make any radical changes. Just hazarding a wild guess here, you MIGHT play 3 or 4 hands per 100 differently by implementing the changes I have recommended. Don't go crazy, ease into these changes, experiment with them on some occasions, see how they work, and then slowly change them into things you routinely do.
Good stats, good luck at the tables, stay off Digger's blinds, lol.