OTT we have some hands that benefit from protection like QT no club, 77 no club, TT no club etc that want to jam. To balance this range we need some bluff and AJcc looks like a very nice combo to do it. If you get called by KQ you have also A as an out.
Jamming turn for me is a very good play also because when we have exactly AJ we are blocking most of Villan check folding range. I would prefer calling turn with a hand like 56cc and bluffing if river miss and Villan check
In gtow its 5bb mistake to jam. Most of the hands that you fold out are hands that you crush like KJ or weaker fd, so you would prefer to jam lower kicker Ax fd
In gtow its 5bb mistake to jam. Most of the hands that you fold out are hands that you crush like KJ or weaker fd, so you would prefer to jam lower kicker Ax fd
yeah but I get owned OTR when I blank out because all those hands jam that I'm beating. AK bluffs river a lot too so I can't just call it off.
I solved the spot too, after solving it (idk if I made some mistake, nl50 rake and complex solution) but SB is supposed to check 40% of his range OTF. When Villan bet 25% I am thinking that he is range betting this board.
If villan is range betting this board I like jamming even more tbh. The point of jamming A4cc and A5cc actually does make sense, in this way we block less fold OTT
I had (and still have to some extent) similar leak of jamming ip good draws, but preety much all those spots are betwean 1-5BB punts in solver, maybe you can jam here as an exploit against people who 3bet too much and overbarrel, but it supposed to be very, very rare in real games, and people misplay so many rivers that I would rather expect all those jams to be even bigger losers than those 1-5bb
In my A game i just jam here sets against fish, and just call all continuing range against good players
I solved the spot too, after solving it (idk if I made some mistake, nl50 rake and complex solution) but SB is supposed to check 40% of his range OTF. When Villan bet 25% I am thinking that he is range betting this board.
If villan is range betting this board I like jamming even more tbh. The point of jamming A4cc and A5cc actually does make sense, in this way we block less fold OTT
I have the same for my solve. Cbet at 60%. frequency so I'm assuming range as well.
I had (and still have to some extent) similar leak of jamming ip good draws, but preety much all those spots are betwean 1-5BB punts in solver, maybe you can jam here as an exploit against people who 3bet too much and overbarrel, but it supposed to be very, very rare in real games, and people misplay so many rivers that I would rather expect all those jams to be even bigger losers than those 1-5bb
In my A game i just jam here sets against fish, and just call all continuing range against good players
Players actually over cbet and over double barrel in this spot
I played around with some solves in GTO+, and if your premises that villain both over-barrels turn and just pure folds AK to a jam are correct, then jamming is just about equal in EV to calling with AcJc. In most scenarios though, solver much prefers to jam bare AcXc/9c8c (and sometimes KcJc), and pure call anything else that's pair+FD or gutshot+FD
I think calling is just the better overall play though, because I don't know if there's actually a relevant scenario where jamming yields greater EV than calling. Best outcome is probably just that it's roughly the same in EV, but even that's dependent upon those two assumptions always being true. I think it makes sense to just pure call your highest equity clubs, and jam the lowest equity ones based on what aner0 is saying
I think that the freq with which villain folds AK OTT is definitely relevant, because people folding equity is great, but I don't think the possibility of villain bluffing us off AJ when they have KJ or J9s really is relevant. We have bluffcatchers to deal with bluffs. If villain is blasting both KJ and J9s OTR at full freq, we can just call more with bluffcatchers
I played around with some solves in GTO+, and if your premises that villain both over-barrels turn and just pure folds AK to a jam are correct, then jamming is just about equal in EV to calling with AcJc. In most scenarios though, solver much prefers to jam bare AcXc/9c8c (and sometimes KcJc), and pure call anything else that's pair+FD or gutshot+FD
I think calling is just the better overall play though, because I don't know if there's actually a relevant scenario where jamming yields greater EV than calling. Best outcome is probably just that it's roughly the same in EV, but even that's dependent upon those two assumptions always being true. I think it makes sense to just pure call your highest equity clubs, and jam the lowest equity ones based on what aner0 is saying
I think that the freq with which villain folds AK OTT is definitely relevant, because people folding equity is great, but I don't think the possibility of villain bluffing us off AJ when they have KJ or J9s really is relevant. We have bluffcatchers to deal with bluffs. If villain is blasting both KJ and J9s OTR at full freq, we can just call more with bluffcatchers
Yes thank you for reminding me I want to nodelock ranging flop and over barreling turn and see how AJcc fares.
Results as well.
Hand History driven straight to this forum with DriveHUD 2 Poker HUD and Database Software
Okay I ran it in GTO+ and it becomes less of a punt like whitemares said. What is interesting is how much of an EV difference the lower kicker FD's have like A5cc/A4cc. Those become insta ships OTT.
Last edited by DooDooPoker; 05-26-2023 at 11:53 AM.
Our hand seems too good to be jamming. Surprised to see Ac5c jam, feel like we want to flush over flush villain
Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk
You need to balance your value range that's why there are some jams with those hands
When river miss it's important to understand which missed FD you wanna jam to not overbluff, AJcc blocks to many x/f, the lowers one are the best candidate