Hi guys.


I'm looking to play large volume 4 table PLO25/50 Pokerstars ZOOM vs GGPoker

Obviously theres a lot of opinions on how GGPoker PLO rake is terrible. However they have insane rakeback schemes.

How does pokerstars current 30%ish rakeback boxes compare to GGpoker if we are putting large volume 4 tables in?

I believe the CAP is LOWER on GGPOKER; HOWEVER they rake preflop in GGPoker. How does the maths add up here?

Which is better? Anyone have any calculations? Comparisons of winnings between the two?

Anyone have graphs beating GGPOKER PLO Fast FORMAT PRE-RAKEBACK over reasonable volume??

Hoping to play approximately 2-5 hours a day grinding four tables and want to put my energy into the right website

Hi mate. I don’t play PLO but I usually check this website to compare rakeback on sites. Hope this helps.

https://www.primedope.com/online-pok...ke-calculator/

Can't believe people still think that gg rakes preflop. They do not rake preflop. They rake uncalled 3bets preflop.

That's still terrible

GG R&C rake is about 7-8 BB/100 according to my PT4. Obviously nittier players pay a bit less. I'm in the Killer Whale "50% cash back" scheme. In reality I've been getting back less than 20%, last week it was 18%. From the flip outs it has been about 10% so far during the last few months. Expect less than 30% total if you're not 4-tabling for 16 hours a day to hit the top 5 of the leaderboards.

Yeah that's still annoying. I know gtow has separate preflop charts to apply this. Lazy question: how much does this affect our entire gameplan? IS it even worthwhile to plug in those ranges that nobody is really using?

Rake isn't going to be the only deciding factor of course. We need to think about fish ratio. Common wisdom is global is the aquarium but is that still true idk