Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon G
Did you even read mine or Yuv's posts about the HU situation in this thread or did you just decide to come in and start shouting?
We have stated many times that a solution is being worked on that will result in a limited number of HU tables at each stake, where you must play or be kicked from the table.
The decision to hide tables in the meantime has been made because it looks frankly horrible to have 200 HU games with one player sat in the lobby. I find it laughable that you accuse this decision of ruining the HU situation. The HU situation has always been awful, even before this everytime i checked there were basically never any games going. Your chances of a fish deciding to sit down on your table out of the countless others have basically gone from 1/100 to something a little lower.
I'd also like to comment on the 'just limit each player to one/two tables per stake' posts that have been made in the past day or so. Those systems don't generate play. We'd just end up with 1/2 or 1/4 as many half-filled tables as we do now. An improvement, but hardly great.
Anyway, the end result of this is that there will be a system in place that will actually generate play at HU. If you're confident in your game (which you sound), surely you will welcome this.
Yeah i've been seeing what you have been writing. It's still a horrible to hide the HU tables by default in the meantime. For all I know you guys are as slow as always and use 6-12months(read "fpp store") to get a decent solution on the HU situation.
When you say that HU tables should be removed in an ideal world, where do you get that from? That's the biggest joke I've ever heard. Heads up is the most accurate game in the pokerworld to decide what players that are donks. I don't say that it can decide anything, but it is still the most accurate game to decide who is best against one or another.
You can't see whats the problem in hiding the HU tables by default? Well, if you say that my chances are 1/100 to get a game before it's gone down to 0.01/100 now.
And some players are more selective in chosing hours to play. From 1am to 7am european time, I usually have 75% chance to get a game on 10-20/25-50 and about 30-40% at 5-10. Now it's more like zero. Do you expect me to do anything else than shouting when you take parts of my job away? I don't want to suffer because you are to incompetent to understand that both 6-max and HU should be treated equally and fair. That's called FAIR gaming. I will be very suprised if I EVER see that ftp or stars does something like this. Even fcin Everestpoker is more serious than this.
Anyway, you guys did a good job on the update even though i would prefer some more speed in the game like the old versions. And PLEASE change the defaultsettings untill you get you HU solution up running.
Im just courious btw, since you do agree with the 6-max monkeys in their whining on selective HU players here, what do you think of the same players never start their own games and instasitting whenever a donk sits and instaleaves when the donk is done? This can't be good for the site either, or?
In an ideal world everyone would play everyone, like old times on stars. I don't care if players are selective or not. Im not one of them and plays 99% of the field any day on pac, but I believe in a fair game. If the 6-max regs are selective, witch atleast 80% is, why complain about the HU players that bumhunts?
AND, please do something about the bug that keeps kicking me out of all 12 tables if I disc for 10secs and sits back in.