Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomLurker
Personally I don't like zoom but this is just pure nonsense and coming from a coach just bizarre. I believe that majority of the players get better hourly playing zoom vs bumhunting and trying to find tables that don't brake constantly or a filled with other sitting out bum hunters.
That might be the case if you can only play ignition etc anon games but dude stop saying sheet like that.
Hey man, so first of all I want to say that it is OK to disagree on something, of course.
My argument for not playing zoom is simple:
- the average winrate in bb/100 is significantly lower for winning regulars
- fish play tighter and you can not focus them
These two things combined result in two major problems:
- if you don't get to target the fish, where most of your winrate comes from, you just end up reg battling too much, which decreases your winrate and thus significantly increases variance
- if your overall bb/100 is lower, you are prone to experience much more significant and longer lasting downswings, which is horrible for mental game, which is key to be a professional.
Just my two cents. Not saying zoom can't be beaten and that you can not play it if you want to succeed. I am just sure that playing regular tables will be much more profitable and much less stressful. About the tables breaking - I am playing ROW sites as well as Ignition and I rarely experience such problems. Usually if you play multiple sites you can tableselect pretty hard, which makes up for a nice winrate increase. Also, I don't think the average reg is bumhunting as much as they should.
EDIT:
Mobius explains this really simply and in detail in one of his blog posts. I am not sure if I can put the URL here, so to not break any rules, just google "Mobius Poker Blog" and in the first result that comes up, you can scroll down to find an article called "You should probably stop playing zoom" with good explanation.
GL