Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
** Official October uBBV Thread ** NSFW ** Official October uBBV Thread ** NSFW

10-05-2010 , 07:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOONERCAM
do it again imo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dint
this
will more than likely do this again. but going to put up a package offer for the winner. 3 sessions and mentoring between, depending on skillset. Hopefully help someone move up a stake or cement him as a solid winner at his stakes.
will make it more expensive tho, but still lot of added value.
really busy the next few days, when i have something clear out I will do this.
10-05-2010 , 07:33 AM
false is a subjective word and doesnt reflect the truth in this matter only your opinion. i was just stating a fact that i find it interesting that poker players are interested in philosophy. whats wrong with that statement? kinda same thing if cop takes pottery classes or linguistic major falls into astronomy and stars taking Venus pictures. nothing wrong with that, just find it interesting for such diverse fields to fit together. How can that be false?
10-05-2010 , 07:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iksmirp
false is a subjective word and doesnt reflect the truth in this matter only your opinion. i was just stating a fact that i find it interesting that poker players are interested in philosophy. whats wrong with that statement? kinda same thing if cop takes pottery classes or linguistic major falls into astronomy and stars taking Venus pictures. nothing wrong with that, just find it interesting for such diverse fields to fit together. How can that be false?
Now you're just saying something else. Either you are unable to analyze this whole conversation and its content somewhat logic or it is a language barrier(or both maybe) issue.
Anyway it all has to do with your definition of "good", if your definition of good at math, science and psychology is limited to knowing 2+2=4 and that the earth is spinning around the sun and that we all have emotions, basic knowledge, then your statement is true but if that's the case, then your statement is pointless. Like saying, hey, 1+1=2.
10-05-2010 , 07:47 AM
i like philosophy. pretty good at it. however everyone is all everyone good. hard to feel good when you just took someone else food for their kid.

=[
10-05-2010 , 07:54 AM
Survival of the fittest baby.

Oh also imma, philosophy should be seen as entertainment and therefor it shouldn't have a negative impact on your emotions. Philosophy/religion and whatnot is not something you want to base your decisions/life on.

Last edited by Swiiftx; 10-05-2010 at 07:59 AM.
10-05-2010 , 07:57 AM
obv u can calculate differential equations and triple integrals which makes u above average good in math but if you think i implied every poker player knows that you are more delusional than i am, and you can interpret that statement however you like. hence the word 'usualy' which implies a lot but not all.

also, i wanted to start the day with an easy going discussion in bbv, posting some non obligatory bullschitt like 98% of posts around here, but i get bashed so much we need 20+ posts just to clarify a simple statement, but obv im too ******ed for that.

Last edited by iksmirp; 10-05-2010 at 08:04 AM.
10-05-2010 , 07:58 AM
mr big, teach me to crush
10-05-2010 , 08:09 AM
while we're discussing plo, i was sweating skraper playing plo like 2 months ago or something, he hadn't played a lot of online plo before i think
anyway super std hand we open random AAxx in sb bb calls we flop top set on AK9r and bet twice. turn is some blank, river is 9 and villain jams on our bet, i say "he has quads" and i was not kidding
10-05-2010 , 08:14 AM
swift, knock it off. you don't have to come in here and pick a fight with everyone in here. find another place to do it.
10-05-2010 , 08:23 AM
Little bitches itt.
10-05-2010 , 08:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by udbrky
swift, knock it off. you don't have to come in here and pick a fight with everyone in here. find another place to do it.
Didn't know this was a kindergarten. I guess everyone has to hold hands and agree on everything.
10-05-2010 , 08:37 AM
no, but you can be more civil about it and not have the majority of your posts getting into it with people, and iksmirp, knock it off too.
10-05-2010 , 08:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharkbaitOHH
Yeah buddy.

Poker Stars $0.50/$1 Pot Limit Omaha Hi - 6 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter By DeucesCracked Poker Videos

Hero (MP): $206.90
CO: $100.00
BTN: $22.25
SB: $110.30
BB: $433.70
UTG: $112.40

Pre Flop: ($1.50) Hero is MP with A 3 T J
UTG raises to $3.50, Hero calls $3.50, 1 fold, BTN calls $3.50, SB raises to $18.50, 1 fold, UTG calls $15, Hero calls $15, BTN calls $15

Flop: ($75.00) K 5 4 (4 players)
SB bets $64, UTG raises to $93.90 all in, Hero raises to $157.90, BTN calls $3.75 all in, SB calls $27.80 all in

Turn: ($358.35) 6 (4 players - 3 are all in)

River: ($358.35) K (4 players - 3 are all in)

Final Pot: $358.35
Hero shows A 3 T J (a flush, King high - Jack higher)
BTN shows 7 9 5 3 (a straight, Three to Seven)
SB shows K Q Q A (three of a kind, Kings)
UTG shows 5 9 T 8 (a flush, King high)
Hero wins $4.20
Hero wins $264.15
Hero wins $87.00
(Rake: $3.00)
jamming the flop is pretty bad. didnt realise SSPLO ran like this
10-05-2010 , 08:39 AM
This is the problem when people don't take classes like logic, can't put together a civil argument and resort to name calling and ad hominem attacks, because they don't know how to construct and deconstruct arguments and debate.
10-05-2010 , 08:45 AM
i think ryan was playing vs aggro 60/55 fish or something, in which case i think you cant fold flop
10-05-2010 , 08:46 AM
I think I broke down my argument well(Could have been better but that means more time consuming), I asked him what he defined as good, gave him an example of what kind of answer I wanted and then stated I thought his statement was wrong considering my definition of good. I also added in a lol to give it a touch of interwebz 2+2 forums etc.
10-05-2010 , 08:48 AM
then you go onto attacking him as a person.
10-05-2010 , 08:48 AM
does no-one else just lololol at front end when they see this thread title

50nl resteal with AA didnt work, now oop against unders

its just so funny

i mean

resteal= lol
resteal with AA= lol
didnt work= minor lol
unders= massive LOLOL

its pure awesomeness
10-05-2010 , 08:49 AM
AA is just a one-pair hand, yo
10-05-2010 , 08:51 AM
i thought my simple as it gets statements was self explanatory to half educated people but you had to trip over the least important part of it and spend 45 minutes to try and look me ******ed which seems kind of a sport around here. have your way, i don't care.
10-05-2010 , 08:53 AM
yeah, so move on, let's not bore and tard up the thread
10-05-2010 , 09:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark89er
does no-one else just lololol at front end when they see this thread title

50nl resteal with AA didnt work, now oop against unders

its just so funny

i mean

resteal= lol
resteal with AA= lol
didnt work= minor lol
unders= massive LOLOL

its pure awesomeness
dont you just hate it when you steal with AA and it doesnt work?
you have 2 blockers ffs
10-05-2010 , 09:22 AM
i know, not just one blocker, you've two!! but ****, the board is all unders!!! wtf!!!

seriously, better using 73s, ovb will boat up
10-05-2010 , 09:24 AM
well no ****. 73s has 6 outs to improve, not to mention the flush and straight possibilities. AA only has 2 outs.
10-05-2010 , 09:27 AM
damn 2 outs, got to start folding that trash

btw, udbrky, are u banned? or where u self banned, or what is the banned thing abt

      
m