Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*****Official February "greatest place on the interwebs" Chat Thread!***** *****Official February "greatest place on the interwebs" Chat Thread!*****

02-23-2009 , 04:54 PM
Yeah if you go to one of the video threads in the sticky, all the threads are there but some of the video links are dead (most are). I'll go through them when I get home tonight and send you a list of usernames, stakes, and videos that are still working. That way there can be one giant video list instead of 2 old ones with some working, some not, etc. Props for keeping that thread up to date though, my first few weeks here it was like my homepage
02-23-2009 , 05:21 PM
Everything in the two "Video Archive" threads should be in the "Videos sorted by buy-in" and "Videos sorted by poster" lists.

I've gone through everything up to and including 50NL and there've only been a few missing videos (Turns out I don't have to wait the 60 seconds for Megaupload to allow the downloads, you can tell right away if they're functional or not). Megaupload doesn't seem to ever expire files.

Done - About 75 videos total.

Last edited by Cry Me A River; 02-23-2009 at 05:40 PM.
02-23-2009 , 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cry Me A River
Just updated the FAQ, please let me know if I missed anything. Kthanks.

A ton of videos added, we now have a pretty big stockpile. However, actually very few for 2NL and 5NL (only one 2NL video). If anybody wants to make a video that sticks out, I think there's a niche there especially now that FTP has added lower stakes too. Particularly a video exploiting the deep stack play at these stakes...
I'll do it this week.
02-23-2009 , 05:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cry Me A River
especially now that FTP has added lower stakes
<snip>
deep stack play
Can anyone fill me in on the buyin limits at the new micro stakes on FTP?

TIA
02-23-2009 , 05:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by noidea555
I'll do it this week.
Post it in the Beginner forum too please!
02-23-2009 , 05:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtSF
Can anyone fill me in on the buyin limits at the new micro stakes on FTP?
Full Tilt adds Micro stakes tables
02-23-2009 , 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cry Me A River
There's nothing in that thread about being able to buyin deep at the new tables.

Are the new uNL tables at FTP 100b buyin, or 200+ like at Stars?
02-23-2009 , 06:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDataKid
I have found a solution to like poker again, anybody want to change accounts with me?

man,
I should read this post over and over again because I am really starting to forget:

I am not supposed to win !!!!

and we should use this stamp in horrible hand threads:

Great thread! This had me laughing:

Quote:
An equity edge is NOT a golden stamp saying "Sup dude! Ship the monies!"
02-23-2009 , 07:16 PM
the thread is awesome, I have to read it on daily basis
02-23-2009 , 07:21 PM
I need to make this avatar look better, then beg stars to let me use it.
02-23-2009 , 07:24 PM
Why wouldn't they let you use it?
02-23-2009 , 07:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtSF
There's nothing in that thread about being able to buyin deep at the new tables.

Are the new uNL tables at FTP 100b buyin, or 200+ like at Stars?
They're not like the Stars tables. They have std. 20-100bb and deep 50-200bb buy in tables, like at the other limits.
02-23-2009 , 07:29 PM
Because I've changed my avatar once already and they're like noooo only one change!! fookers.
02-23-2009 , 07:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by toedder
They're not like the Stars tables. They have std. 20-100bb and deep 50-200bb buy in tables, like at the other limits.
ty

I'm at work and I could have checked when I get home, but I was curious.
02-23-2009 , 07:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RapidEvolution
Because I've changed my avatar once already and they're like noooo only one change!! fookers.
I know some stars players who have had several avatar changes. Mind you if you played more than 400 hands a month they might let you too.
02-23-2009 , 08:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RapidEvolution
I need to make this avatar look better, then beg stars to let me use it.
Don't tap the glass.
02-23-2009 , 08:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RapidEvolution
I need to make this avatar look better, then beg stars to let me use it.
I like your avatar, don't change it on stars. I thought you could change them whne ever you want? I've changed mine once and I hate my current one but it does blend into the background a bit.
02-23-2009 , 11:08 PM
It'd make you sad to see Little Mac go? I was also thinking of writing " AI Play pokar" in crayon and scanning it.
02-23-2009 , 11:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RapidEvolution
It'd make you sad to see Little Mac go? I was also thinking of writing " AI Play pokar" in crayon and scanning it.
you can do some amazing things with scanners, digital cameras and photoshop. gogogogo
02-24-2009 , 02:25 AM
where is mpethy's coaching vid?
02-24-2009 , 05:57 AM
im so excited I have 9 days in a row off of work!
02-24-2009 , 06:03 AM
Played an hour of 5nl @ 60/45. Down $10, all of it in allin EV.

I think I might be an action junkie.




Full Tilt Poker, $0.02/$0.05 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 8 Players

MP1: $7.36
Hero (MP2): $21.70
CO: $5.59
BTN: $10.89
SB: $5
BB: $4.45
UTG: $4.48
UTG+1: $5.23

Pre-Flop:
UTG folds, UTG+1 calls $0.05, MP1 folds, Hero raises to $0.22, 2 folds, SB raises to $0.55, 2 folds, Hero calls $0.33

Flop: ($1.20) 6 9 4 (2 Players)
SB bets $0.85, Hero calls $0.85

Turn: ($2.90) 9 (2 Players)
SB bets $3.60 and is All-In, Hero calls $3.60

River: ($10.10) T (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

Results: $10.10 Pot ($0.67 Rake)
Hero showed Q 4 (two pair, Nines and Fours) and WON $9.43 (+$4.43 NET)
SB showed K A (a pair of Nines) and LOST (-$5 NET)
I eventually busted 4 or 5 people at this table and it broke.




Full Tilt Poker, $0.02/$0.05 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 9 Players

BB: $5
UTG: $10.02
UTG+1: $1.63
UTG+2: $5.19
MP1: $10.94
Hero (MP2): $8.75
CO: $6.61
BTN: $12.54
SB: $13.08

Pre-Flop:
UTG folds, UTG+1 calls $0.05, 2 folds, Hero raises to $0.22, CO folds, BTN raises to $0.39, 3 folds, Hero calls $0.17

Flop: ($0.90) Q 8 2 (2 Players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $0.35, Hero raises to $1.95, BTN calls $1.60

Turn: ($4.80) 9 (2 Players)
Hero checks, BTN checks

River: ($4.80) 5 (2 Players)
Hero bets $3.21, BTN folds

Results: $4.80 Pot ($0.32 Rake)
Hero mucked T K and WON $4.48 (+$2.14 NET)
Down a couple bis at this table.




Full Tilt Poker, $0.02/$0.05 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 9 Players

BB: $5
UTG: $11.09
UTG+1: $6.25
UTG+2: $2.14
MP1: $10
Hero (MP2): $5.20
CO: $5.53
BTN: $14.97
SB: $4.42

Pre-Flop:
4 folds, Hero raises to $0.17, CO calls $0.17, 3 folds

Flop: ($0.41) 2 9 K (2 Players)
Hero bets $0.31, CO calls $0.31

Turn: ($1.03) 5 (2 Players)
Hero bets $0.78, CO calls $0.78

River: ($2.59) 3 (2 Players)
Hero bets $1.47, CO calls $1.47

Results: $5.53 Pot ($0.36 Rake)
Hero showed A 2 (a pair of Twos) and LOST (-$2.73 NET)
CO showed J K (a pair of Kings) and WON $5.17 (+$2.44 NET)
Same table as hand #2.




Looking at those HH, I realize now how bad the rake sux. OMG.
02-24-2009 , 06:19 AM
Just returning from a weekend back home. It was nice to be back in the old country. I'll be reading up on the important threads today; I finished this one first.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cry Me A River
Lowering short-term variance, generally, also sacrifices EV and win rate. Which in turn increases long term variance (higher win rate means you are much less likely to have long downswings).
Sorry, but I have to disagree here. A low variance game doesn't lead to high variance in the long term. A low winrate doesn't lead to high variance neither. Winrate and variance are two independent statistics. The fact is that a higher winrate cushions the effects of variance in the sense that you are less likely to go on long downswings despite high variance.

This may be related to our habit to equate variance with downswings.
02-24-2009 , 10:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cangurino
Just returning from a weekend back home. It was nice to be back in the old country. I'll be reading up on the important threads today; I finished this one first.



Sorry, but I have to disagree here. A low variance game doesn't lead to high variance in the long term. A low winrate doesn't lead to high variance neither. Winrate and variance are two independent statistics. The fact is that a higher winrate cushions the effects of variance in the sense that you are less likely to go on long downswings despite high variance.

This may be related to our habit to equate variance with downswings.
We were just having this fight over in B&M too!

Variance is deviation from expectation.

Poker players tend to misuse the term to refer to losing or breakeven stretches. This seems to be very common, very. But its just a colloquialism within the subculture, and it kinda bends my mind getting both meanings into the same idea.

Lower variance can lead to longer breakeven stretches and deeper losing streaks. That's what everyone means.

But many say lower variance leads to higher variance.

$0.02
02-24-2009 , 11:02 AM
Interesting subject,
all I know it's all in the head
If every hand is a new situation you just have to forget about the last situation you lost

All you have is a change to winning a certain pot, you have to deal with the fact you aren't suppose to win the pot. You have a good change to win the pot, that's all.

Ofcourse somebody can say that he or she runs bad, if you know you are a winning player and every session you win small or lose then you know the cards hasn't been treating you quit well

But, lets say I would have started to grind without 2p2 (i would be broke, but still, picture it) I would never called this period a doomswitch, or a doomswing, or running bad..

I would probably say something like: Well, I have been lucky for such a long time and now luck in on their side, it's still playing cards where you have to get lucky that your hand hold up (and then still throw my telephone to the wall)

I find it super hard to think this way when I keep losing but it's the truth. It's just battles my logic: Playing better then your opponent = win

That just isn't the truth in poker

      
m