Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*****Official February "greatest place on the interwebs" Chat Thread!***** *****Official February "greatest place on the interwebs" Chat Thread!*****

02-05-2009 , 05:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtSF
How much did you put on that bet? (I know its not kosher in polite company, but this is a gambling forum, so we talk about our wagers. ) How leveraged are you?

I "paper traded" a lot, but I never got up the gumption to actually short anything. I did well on paper.

Reminds me of a dude that used to hang around here, I think wolffund was his name. Typical degen, but one time he made $2,000,000 overnight because he shorted just the right thing at just the right time... all with money he borrowed off his wife. Hah.
500 shares of BAC, (cash), and I did 5 contracts on Citi.
02-05-2009 , 05:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by brocksavage1
There's no strategy in poker.
Raise for information???
02-05-2009 , 05:20 PM
i don't get the raise for information line...

every check, fold, bet or raise, by me and my opponents, gives me information (specially of their range).
02-05-2009 , 05:21 PM
Bad news, Sammy -- I paid off the last of my debt to Bank of America Corp last month. I think when you itemize their 4th quarter returns, you'll see that the interest I was paying them was the main thing keeping them afloat.
02-05-2009 , 05:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by I vi ii V7
Sorry I don't really know what I'm talking about. I just watched Rounders (I think that's the name lol!) and I think I want to give Texas Hold 'Em a shot! All I can think about right now is Vegas and the ****ing Mirage.

edit: And taking "stacks" off tourists, whatever that means.
You were lookin' for that third three, but you forgot that Professor Green folded on Fourth Street and now you're representing that you have it. The DA made his two pair, but he knows they're no good. Judge Kaplan was trying to squeeze out a diamond flush but he came up short and Mr. Eisen is futilely hoping that his queens are going to stand up. So like I said, the Dean's bet is $20.
02-05-2009 , 05:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpethybridge
I just found out that the girl at my local Starbucks is a friend of yours, Kurt.
Is that a global warming joke? Or are you being literal?
02-05-2009 , 05:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pheisar
i don't get the raise for information line...
Like, you know, on the turn, when their lead out range is polarized to nuts or air, and you can raise now to fold out air so you don't have to look up a big bet on the river.

Might be more useful in MTTs though....
02-05-2009 , 05:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conan776
Like, you know, on the turn, when their lead out range is polarized to nuts or air, and you can raise now to fold out air so you don't have to look up a big bet on the river.

Might be more useful in MTTs though....
did you bothered reading ALL my post? :P
02-05-2009 , 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtSF
Is that a global warming joke? Or are you being literal?
well, I got up from our argument on global warming to go get coffee at starbucks, and she dumped a venti coffee on my crotch. she said it was an accident, but i am suspicious of the coincidence, tbh...

Last edited by mpethybridge; 02-05-2009 at 05:37 PM. Reason: plus, correlation equals causation, doesn't it?
02-05-2009 , 05:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pheisar
did you bothered reading ALL my post? :P
The thing is you are not raising for value. You might raise for value and happen to get information. If you understand the dichotomy sorry to misunderstand your rhetorical question.
02-05-2009 , 05:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpethybridge
well, I got up from our argument on global warming to go get coffee at starbucks, and she dumped a venti coffee on my crotch. she said it was an accident, but i am suspicious of the coincidence, tbh...
Ah, must be Tracey. She's a vindictive one, she is.
02-05-2009 , 05:38 PM
Sigh... no Cincinnati Kid fans ITT.
02-05-2009 , 05:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpethybridge
well, I got up from our argument on global warming to go get coffee at starbucks, and she dumped a venti coffee on my crotch.
LOL. Changed your mind yet? We got people everywhere you know.

(What's a zealous religious movement without it's own Knights Templar?)
02-05-2009 , 05:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpethybridge View Post
well, I got up from our argument on global warming to go get coffee at starbucks, and she dumped a venti coffee on my crotch.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtSF
Ah, must be Tracey. She's a vindictive one, she is.
LOL
02-05-2009 , 05:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conan776
Like, you know, on the turn, when their lead out range is polarized to nuts or air, and you can raise now to fold out air so you don't have to look up a big bet on the river.

Might be more useful in MTTs though....
I was being sarcastic. Alex and I use to have this disdain for people who would post on strat thread 1) Raise for information, 2)Wait for a better spot, 3)Check for Pot Control...

1 and 3 can vary rarely every be use correctly, although there are times its plausible

2 is just stupid for cash games, its either -EV or +EV. (of course if we apply decision theory...)
02-05-2009 , 05:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conan776
LOL. Changed your mind yet? We got people everywhere you know.
LOL, I haven't even changed my pants yet.
02-05-2009 , 06:01 PM
Lol guys, thanks for the chuckles.
02-05-2009 , 06:16 PM
Global warming is BS...I know for a fact since I went surfing (loose definition on surfing, I really just paddle and get pummeled by waves) sunday morning and froze my nutz off.


Case closed.
02-05-2009 , 06:20 PM
do you got a lot of jellyfish Sammy?
02-05-2009 , 06:34 PM
As a Canadian. living in one of the coldest capital cities in the world, all I have to say about global warming is:

Bring it on!!!

Sorry, I just don't see the downside and Al Gore should STFU. Fossil fuels and CFCs for everyone!

Last edited by Cry Me A River; 02-05-2009 at 06:40 PM.
02-05-2009 , 06:38 PM
Question for some of the people here that grind more then 5 hours a day:

There are mixed ideas about this: You should play the juicy hours, but that really means you can only grind 3/4 hours a day?

Does it mean you should avoid the other hours? Or do they mean: You should play the juicy hours, and play the other hours?
02-05-2009 , 06:41 PM
Decided to try out some stuff at 25NL today since 50NL seems dead. That was the most funnest 45 minute seshion i have ever done. Graphs because it happened:

02-05-2009 , 06:44 PM
lol nice grind sir.
25NL is a funny level
02-05-2009 , 06:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDataKid
Question for some of the people here that grind more then 5 hours a day:

There are mixed ideas about this: You should play the juicy hours, but that really means you can only grind 3/4 hours a day?

Does it mean you should avoid the other hours? Or do they mean: You should play the juicy hours, and play the other hours?
Obviously you should play as much as you can if you have an edge. If you have an edge at the less juicy times, add them in; if you lose during the non-juicy times, cut them out.

If you can only play your best for 3 or 4 hours, then you should try to play the juiciest times. But if you can beat the less juicy times and you can grind at your best for a long enough period to include the less juicy games, do it.

I always think of this in terms of the hourly rate that I charged as a lawyer. I had some high volume clients--insurance companies--that sent me scores of cases a year, and, therefore, were charged a lower hourly rate than my usual and customary rate the one off clients paid. But I still spent time on the lower paying cases.

Had I chosen to, I could have turned down all the low paying cases, made good money and worked fewer hours--my hourly would have gone up, but my total income would have gone down if i had only worked the juicy cases.
02-05-2009 , 06:45 PM
^^^^^^^^^

Nice. Please to be sharing some of that heat lol.

      
m