Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
** Official August uBBV Thread ** ** Official August uBBV Thread **

08-16-2010 , 02:28 AM
dci move up to 10nl
08-16-2010 , 02:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaycareInferno
i took today off, but still pretty well ahead of pace for the prop. i'll make it easily barring a car accident or something.
i miss that little lego darth vader guy at 25nl
08-16-2010 , 02:31 AM
no money at 10nl rake is solid
08-16-2010 , 02:31 AM
i dunno. i heard that everyone's solid these days.
08-16-2010 , 02:32 AM
**** owned
08-16-2010 , 02:47 AM
brag - just saw the movie "Human Centipede"

if anyone hasn't seen it i'd highly recommend
08-16-2010 , 03:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comstizzle
brag - just saw the movie "Human Centipede"

if anyone hasn't seen it i'd highly recommend
Always knew you where one creepy & weird mothefk.
08-16-2010 , 03:27 AM
[QUOTE=Dint;20946708
pretty much already reached my goal, i can thank rush for a 20k boost even tho it was totally breakeven :\

p.s try pin point where I decided 50nl heads up would be a good idea.[/QUOTE]

I see you did a lot of folding at 42k. nit.
08-16-2010 , 03:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaycareInferno
i took today off, but still pretty well ahead of pace for the prop. i'll make it easily barring a car accident or something.

Stakes, Amount of time?

Last edited by Mr. Perfect; 08-16-2010 at 03:38 AM. Reason: this month nm...
08-16-2010 , 03:38 AM
How many tables?
08-16-2010 , 03:39 AM
^i believe it is 24tabling NL5 so far this month, referenced itt

Last edited by kp1022; 08-16-2010 at 03:40 AM. Reason: disgusting quantity/winrate combination
08-16-2010 , 03:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Perfect
Stakes, Amount of time?
hes been 24 tabling 5nl (2.67BB/100) to 'get good at 24 tabling'.
08-16-2010 , 04:19 AM
beating 5NL for 2.67BB/100 24-tabling probably means you are breakeven or worse at 25NL. Even BG1 can do better than that.

Stating the obvious.
08-16-2010 , 04:23 AM


nbd, just funny looking
08-16-2010 , 05:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insta-4Bet
beating 5NL for 2.67BB/100 24-tabling probably means you are breakeven or worse at 25NL. Even BG1 can do better than that.

Stating the obvious.
Does not mean that at all.
08-16-2010 , 05:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by z0mgtiltz
Does not mean that at all.
+1
08-16-2010 , 05:17 AM
shut up deadbird.


Obviously 24-tabling 5NL for 2.67BB/100 means something like 24-tabling 25NL for ~-1.5BB/100 at best.
08-16-2010 , 05:25 AM
The new generation of trolls just seem to get dumber and dumber. ^
08-16-2010 , 05:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insta-4Bet
shut up deadbird.


Obviously 24-tabling 5NL for 2.67BB/100 means something like 24-tabling 25NL for ~-1.5BB/100 at best.
and obviously 1 tabling at NL 5000000000000000 at 1BB/1000 hands is way better than 24tabling NL 25 for 100bb/100 hands.

why are you comparing different stakes? and why are you so caught up on stakes?
08-16-2010 , 05:29 AM
dumbestest ^^
08-16-2010 , 05:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by immadeadbird
and obviously 1 tabling at NL 5000000000000000 at 1BB/1000 hands is way better than 24tabling NL 25 for 100bb/100 hands.
orly?

Quote:
Originally Posted by immadeadbird
why are you comparing different stakes?.
I stated the reason.

Quote:
Originally Posted by immadeadbird
and why are you so caught up on stakes?
I jumped and the stakes caught me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by z0mgtiltz
Does not mean that at all.
Well sure, if you can find tables of the exact same 5NL players to play you at 25NL...You must feel that the limits get easier as you move up.
08-16-2010 , 05:39 AM
another thing you ****ed up your math nomeansno.

2.67BB/100 NL5 =/= 1.5BB/100 NL25

since NL 5 is 1/5th the stake of NL 25. therefore to have a equal amount won would be 2.67/5 = 0.534

therefore 2.67 BB/100 at NL5 = .534 BB/100 at NL 25.... for only money won.

i assume your adding extra variables than just amount won.
08-16-2010 , 05:41 AM
mathematician itt
08-16-2010 , 05:42 AM
08-16-2010 , 05:43 AM
At least I was just picking a random number, deadbird actually came up with an entire formula that has no validity at all.



2NLHU now deadbird.

      
m