Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** *** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread ***

05-11-2014 , 05:07 PM
can you play .EU and .FR simultaneously?
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-11-2014 , 05:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slugant
can you play .EU and .FR simultaneously?
yes as they don't share player pools
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-11-2014 , 05:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by woolly
non-europeans too?
Yar, you have to have a bank account registed in the eu though
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-11-2014 , 06:16 PM
What is 13_Xerxes sn, pardama?
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-11-2014 , 06:22 PM
Vinniepooh
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-11-2014 , 06:32 PM
it's DIMOSS
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-11-2014 , 06:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_smith77
Vinniepooh
There is no such player Mr. Smith.
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-11-2014 , 06:35 PM
actually there is
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-11-2014 , 07:09 PM
Is $200NL really three times more profitable for you than $100NL?

Last edited by pontylad; 05-12-2014 at 05:35 PM.
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-11-2014 , 07:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doofus Krondelly
There is no such player Mr. Smith.
Ohhhhh pokie
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-11-2014 , 07:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_smith77
Ohhhhh pokie
Ohhhhh Mr. Smith.
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-11-2014 , 07:14 PM
By the way, do people still apologise when they suck-out on someone, or is it just me?
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-11-2014 , 08:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doofus Krondelly
Is $200NL really three times more profitable for you than $100NL?
Yep, I don't understand why... But I need to add NL100 to have enough tables (if I play too few tables, I do not play my optimal game, and I am bored = spew).
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-11-2014 , 08:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13_Xerxes
Yep, I don't understand why... But I need to add NL100 to have enough tables (if I play too few tables, I do not play my optimal game, and I am bored = spew).
What is your win rate at each?
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-11-2014 , 08:25 PM
if your one of the best players really soft games this wont be too difficult, i mean that coordi nearly did it and he was pretty grey from the looks of it
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-11-2014 , 08:36 PM
Mayo the Don.
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-11-2014 , 09:44 PM
well, if you want this to go down then i imagine no one is going to bet without wanting to know your SN first.
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-11-2014 , 11:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_smith77
Ohhhhh pokie
OK, I didn't know it was a troll acount.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/pr...gnore&u=378975
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-12-2014 , 03:21 AM
Well you will certainly have to out your SN to the judges before any bet can take place (not afterwards) other wise the bet is too open to possible cheating.
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-12-2014 , 04:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13_Xerxes
Winning at 2PTBB, with my standard deviation, I got 28.46% chances to lose after 12k hands.

http://pokerdope.com/poker-variance-calculator/

So, if I made 8 sessions of 12k hands, I got only 71.54% chance to win ONE session, after 8 sessions, chances are 6.86% to winning this bet. And I only ask 2.5:1 (lol, I am such a fish).

I am OK to lower the max hands par day, but I will ask like 30:1, so... And I will get zero action of course.

(winning at 3PTBB -lol- : chances are 80.34% to win ONE session, 17.35% to win the bet)
(winning at 4PTBB -welcome back in 2003- : chances are respectivly 87.25% and 33.58% after 8 sessions)

And that is the best case scenario, where I made 8 sessions of 12k hands. I will probably make a lot of sessions about 2-3k hands, so variance should be a lot higher : chances to lose a session with 2PTBB and 3k hands = 38.80%.
You cant analyse this bet like this, these simulations are very, very misleading.

At th start of each session, you wont know how many hands you're going to play. Obviously you'll only keep playing beyond the session minimum when stuck, you can then quit at any point if you get to zero.

So to simulate this accurately, you'd need to take th chances of winning after th minimum number of hands, then th chances of being at zero or above AT ANY POINT from then to th max number of hands. Th combined probabilities of neither of these things happening would be your chance of a winning day = substantially higher than th numbers you quoted.

This is kind of obvious, your 'i'm such a fish only asking for x:1' seems like a hustle if you've spent any time thinking about this.

Idk how to simulate what i described above, maybe someone cleverer than me could do it

Sent from my GT-I9100 using 2+2 Forums
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-12-2014 , 11:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pontylad
Well you will certainly have to out your SN to the judges before any bet can take place (not afterwards) other wise the bet is too open to possible cheating.
Of course. The 3 judges will have my screenname, and I will ask support to send them directly HHs.

I don't think I will have the "webcam" thing, because :

1) My private life is important, my house is not a zoo.

2) It's not a volume bet, but a "quality bet", and I don't trust anybody other than myself can play better this kind of bet (maybe nanonoko or forhayley, but I don't know them ).
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-12-2014 , 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doofus Krondelly
Reveal more about this tax BS. You're a tax dodger aren't you.
Dude, shut up. Whatever he does or doesn't do with his taxes is none of your business.
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-12-2014 , 02:00 PM
I prefer the old pokie account over this new one and I absolutely despised pokie.
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote
05-12-2014 , 02:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gutter23
Dude, shut up. Whatever he does or doesn't do with his taxes is none of your business.
Except of course it provides an insight into their character, and how much they value honesty and integrity etc.

Kind of important when it comes to anyone partaking in a bet with this person.
*** Official 2014 Pokerstars Regulars Thread *** Quote

      
m