In Mr Monkee's case I'd say both.

LOL.

:-DDD

I used to cry a lot after HU /w Monkee

:|

they probably won lots of milestone $'s

kud3 is hilarious

Both just rich

You feel strongly about this huh?

jcl, I love how you ignored my questions. Maybe you will answer here

How many hands lifetime have you played at the highest stakes you've ever played heads up v a winning regular? What percent of your total hands played at those stakes is that?

This is what you posted in the other thread.



If you want to be able to sit down and play poker when you have time. Play at higher stakes. All you need to do is sit at 100 200 and let the WCG no u'll play. He'll drop whatever to play you or your butt buddy wobbly. Given that your friends with wobbly I can only assume you do the same bs he does at the highest stakes u play


you don't even need to go that high though dude. lmao :P. I love the hypocrisy that you think people like sublime shouldn't be able to bumhunt games you are ok playin any lineup. But you yourself can go bumhunt the high-stakes games.

Stars not working atm?

server restart

damn that post sh@i'tan

that part about 400+ and wanting to even out the margins!!

great post

great post. I hate it tho, because how it makes me feel, nevertheless a great post.

damn.

+1 re:bot stuff. Back on ftp when it was just those Italian accts I wan't sweating it too much because they were pretty bad. Since that thread about the bots on party about a year ago though, I've just felt like the sky is falling. We're getting pretty close to a tipping point I feel, so I'm puttin my grinders cap on and seeing how much i can make before it all goes down

Not a lot of optimism around here these days

posting for subscription

+1 and also BIG +1 to Sh@i'tan's post

I dont agree with you Shaitan. I do not think it is the same. Nowdays, as there are no games running regularly in highstakes (25/50+) no one has prefeerence at this games. But there are a lot of regs willing to play in 5/10 or 10 20, no matter who is in front of. I think they should have preference playing against the fishes, and not a reg who plays only one there is one of them. The regs who play against everyone are more benefitial in the long term than the bumhunters.

Im not saying not to be a bumhuynter. This problem (extreme bumhunting) has to be solved by pokerstars, and until that the most intelligent way to play poker is bumhunting, as its permitted for everyone. But I expect that in the future it wwont be possible to table select (which makes me less $/h, but makes poker much more sustainable).

intersoler post here ?

Then who gets to play the high-stakes games? Only people who battle at the highest stakes that regularly run or is it open season?

If we're ok with everyone's edge going down if we get rid of table selection then ok. Go pimpylimpy's way.

I don't know if that's what everyone wants though. Does Kanu want it so that only the best nl2k players can play with him when a RP is sitting? I kind of feel poker is too sick of the game to expect people who don't love it to put up with the variance of negative expectation and near neutral expectation games.

Yes the extreme bum hunting is a huge problem. There is a difference between bum hunting and extreme bum hunting. I think it should be a one strike rule that if you ever do anything that constitutes it you are banned from playing those stakes. i.e. everyone in that screenshot with scout(?) sitting out and just kanu sitting in

Steve posted this

The best way to deal with that is going to be a manual solution. I believe Stars has it such that you can do things that are against the spirit of the games but they don't enforce it. Quite a joke too, there's no way one employee cant handle doing all that needs to be done.

poker would be back to 2006 if everyone had pimpylimpy game selection.

Fyp

is nanonoko still crushing like he used to, when PTR was up & running? just curious

Highly doubt it.