Quote:
Originally Posted by Fermion5
Quote:
Originally Posted by kflip
50NL FR. One of the tables you don't want to sit at. FY
This is partially the reason WE have trouble convincing FTP to change the structure. When fullstackers see a table like this and say "OMG, this has gotten out of hand."
(a) If they want to play against each other, good for them. It means one more of my tables they can't sit.
(b) but even more tilting to me is that this table might not be so bad to play......for us! If two or three of these guys are bad, insta profit. But cmon fullstackers, THIS table is WAY WAY WAY WAY WAY WAY WAY easier to play than the full tables that have 3 or 4. Gear down and play their game. When people say to adjust, THIS table can be adjusted for.
It really tilts me that thinking fullstackers continually say the above table is a bad one. We've had screen shots on here with 8 shorts and a full. If the full is competent, he's there for a reason. It may not be as profitable as a full ring table with two large fish.....but maybe, just maybe, the fish aren't around or have 12 people on a wait list.
I know this was written too fast and may not be coherent....but hopefully you get the idea. The above table is NOT the bane of our existance.