Quote:
Originally Posted by MrDrTurtleRick
what is the plan, shorts vs firing squad?
RR... I have been making an effort to be civil in the FTP Answer threads....and most definately have been PMing those that haven't been. WE need to take the high ground..... our voices might get heard if we avoid all the ***** attacks.
My "plan" if you haven't read the thread (tho I thot I saw a post from you?)
C20-inf
S20-100
_50-100
D50-200
this gives everyone what they want. Think about it guys.....do you REALLY want the shorts to disappear? They provide a ton of income to FTP. That's a good thing as we will all benefit as FTP throws money into bonii, more (any) cust serv, better software etc.....
With the tables above, we fullstackers don't ever have to see a short again. THAT is a good thing.
The shorts get access to the 100BB fish. WTF do we care, as long as some of the fish float our way? I suspect the fish will gravitate to the 50-100BB tables as OUR NUMBER 1 FUTURE JOB IS TO GET THE WORD OUT. Tell the fish WHY 20-100 is harder to play..... we'll get our share.
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Nino 1
I understand the arguments that you guys are making about the short stackers and playing with them certainly does suck but they are certainly beatable altho they do cause problems as they get in the way of fish
Maybe in the micros you can shrug this off. At 100NL (certainly 200+), we usually have just one decent fish per table....sometimes less. Add a few shorts and it becomes clear that you have to play a less than optimal game.
That said i think that if you table select and move tables often enough you can certainly get some good tables going at all times of the day bar like 5am - 7am FT time. Those are horrible but most evenings the games are good.
It really borders on bumhunting....and getting lucky with your seat assignment. Ever try juggling ontop of a moving train? Try table selecting around the 10+ tables you are currently on.
Man, this game is tough.