I need your help guys ..
Ive gone back to 6 max and will be getting some coaching of a good player from another forum ..
But it has thrown up a debate about why i played FR for so long, it has got other FR players questioning why they play FR and not 6 max ..
Im looking for some feed back from you FR regs as to the merits of FR over 6 max ..
Im defending FR as i have too because i played it for so long ... but the arguement that FR is a better option than 6 max is pretty thin .
I can understand that FR is more appealing at $100nl plus as you can get some decent returns on bonus's / RB etc and playing a load of tables increases this nicely ..
FR at stakes of $25 or lower seems more of a grind than a lucrative proposition... i should know
But in todays FR enviroment you are faced with a shed load more short stackers, a low level of fishes and the ones that are out there are attacked by 7 regs ..
You are also faced with very nitty types from whom you simply cant make a lot of money off over time .
Does the game become an auto pilot scenario with set mining and hopefully some coolers thrown in .. ?
What about post flop decisions ... ? are they less important because players are so tight preflop ...
The FR games are so much tougher nowadays .. even down to the micro levels ...
I know its not all doom and gloom ... just want to hear some positive arguements so i can defend the merits of FR in the other forum ..
What are your goals for the future .. ? .. does every player just want to increase his hourly rate by playing more and more tables ?
Lokking forward to some decent insight into your FR thinking
cheers