***Official 2009 Micro Stakes FR Full Tilt Regulars Thread*** - Page 54 - Micro Stakes Pot Limit and No Limit

Two Plus Two Forums Poker Strategy Online No-Limit Hold’em Cash

***Official 2009 Micro Stakes FR Full Tilt Regulars Thread***

Closed Subscribe

...

Page 54 of 413

First

4 34 44 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 64 74 104 154 254

Last

Page 54 of 413

First

4 34 44 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 64 74 104 154 254

Last

05-04-2009 , 01:14 AM

#1326

Mr Q

grinder

Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 694

assuming they were all earned in FR around $30

($1000/9*).27

05-04-2009 , 01:38 AM

#1327

partypoker123

old hand

Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 1,875

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Q

assuming they were all earned in FR around $30

($1000/9*).27

Thanks

05-04-2009 , 03:18 AM

#1328

dagrim1

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,530

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Q

assuming they were all earned in FR around $30

($1000/9*).27

Hmmm, that's assuming everynone contributes evenly in rake? If your a complete nit and hardly in any (big) pots this would be less right?

05-04-2009 , 03:52 AM

#1329

gregGGhehe

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 4,400

wrong thread saw pp123 assumed it was pstars thread

05-04-2009 , 04:41 AM

#1330

pele02

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 4,531

Quote:

Originally Posted by gregGGhehe

wrong thread saw pp123 assumed it was pstars thread

Stalker!

05-04-2009 , 08:43 AM

#1331

CaptVimes

veteran

Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 2,810

Quote:

Originally Posted by DanielTanner

Seems like the deep tables never fully recovered from the temporary update last week

Yeah, I think you're right. I play mostly 100bb tables and it was much easier this weekend to find good tables without having to weed through a ton of shorties. I did notice, however, that I had played with the sorting options before they came out with the update to fix the problem, and the deep stack tables never showed up with the regular tables for me.

05-04-2009 , 11:55 AM

#1332

Mr Q

grinder

Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 694

Quote:

Originally Posted by dagrim1

Hmmm, that's assuming everynone contributes evenly in rake? If your a complete nit and hardly in any (big) pots this would be less right?

no as the rake is dealt not contributed.

05-04-2009 , 01:03 PM

#1333

entertainme

The Poker Mom

Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 8,444

Quote:

Originally Posted by kflip

I use RakeTheRake and am very pleased with it. Money gets shipped into the account every Friday. They also do rake races and have a monthly freeroll and stuff I don't really care about.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blixx

+1
I've been with RakeTheRake for over 3 years and have nothing but good things to say about them.

05-04-2009 , 03:55 PM

#1334

mpethybridge

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 16,997

Quote:

Originally Posted by kflip

I didn't play much 100NL at all but had the feeling it was like double the aggression preflop.

I'm doing a concept of the week thread where I talk about evaluating villains' stats. In preparing to write it, I have been looking at stuff like this.

At $50, the average player plays 19/8/2.2 and 3 bets about 2.4% At $100, the average player plays 18/8/2.4 and 3 bets about 2.6%

Not much difference, but what there is suggests that $100 is a hair more aggressive overall.

The stats on regs were almost exactly the same--the average reg at both levels plays 12/8/2.2

05-04-2009 , 04:08 PM

#1335

juguerra

veteran

Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 2,806

Plz keep limp calling your PP and slowplaying your sets.
Poker Stars $0.10/$0.25 No Limit Hold'em - 7 players

The Official 2+2 Hand Converter Powered By DeucesCracked.com

Hero (BTN): $25.00
SB: $20.90
BB: $25.00
UTG: $25.00
UTG+1: $25.00
MP: $15.00
CO: $18.60

Pre Flop: ($0.35) Hero is BTN with 5

2 folds, MP calls $0.25, 1 fold, Hero raises to $1.25, 2 folds, MP calls $1

Flop: ($2.85) 7

(2 players)
MP checks, Hero bets $2, MP calls $2

Turn: ($6.85) Q

(2 players)
MP checks, Hero checks

River: ($6.85) 3

(2 players)
MP bets $6.25, Hero raises to $21.75 all in, MP calls $5.50 all in

Final Pot: $30.35
Hero shows 5

(a straight, Three to Seven)
MP mucks 4

Hero wins $28.85
(Rake: $1.50)

05-04-2009 , 04:17 PM

#1336

SammyG-SD

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 12,600

Quote:

Originally Posted by juguerra

2 folds, MP calls $0.25, 1 fold, Hero raises to $1.25, 2 folds, MP calls $1

Flop: ($2.85) 7

(2 players)
MP checks, Hero bets $2, MP calls $2

Turn: ($6.85) Q

(2 players)
MP checks, Hero checks

River: ($6.85) 3

(2 players)
MP bets $6.25, Hero raises to $21.75 all in, MP calls $5.50 all in

Final Pot: $30.35
Hero shows 5

(a straight, Three to Seven)
MP mucks 4

Hero wins $28.85
(Rake: $1.50)

villain's line is awful...............awfully good for you!

05-04-2009 , 05:09 PM

#1337

pele02

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 4,531

Quote:

Originally Posted by juguerra

2 folds, MP calls $0.25, 1 fold, Hero raises to $1.25, 2 folds, MP calls $1

Flop: ($2.85) 7

(2 players)
MP checks, Hero bets $2, MP calls $2

Turn: ($6.85) Q

(2 players)
MP checks, Hero checks

River: ($6.85) 3

(2 players)
MP bets $6.25, Hero raises to $21.75 all in, MP calls $5.50 all in

Final Pot: $30.35
Hero shows 5

(a straight, Three to Seven)
MP mucks 4

Hero wins $28.85
(Rake: $1.50)

You are in the wrong thread m8

..are you stalking pp123 too?

05-04-2009 , 06:26 PM

#1338

dagrim1

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,530

Quote:

Originally Posted by mpethybridge

Wow, really? That's pretty good to hear and gives some rest once I've built my bankroll enough (and played enough hands) to think about moving up to $100NL. At least 2 months or so though I'd think...

05-04-2009 , 07:17 PM

#1339

mpethybridge

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 16,997

Quote:

Originally Posted by dagrim1

I was really surprised by this, too, because when i play $100, I feel like I am being outplayed far more often than when I play $50. But, on average, they are not more aggressive, it just seems like they are, on average, smarter about when they are aggressive.

05-04-2009 , 07:20 PM

#1340

TimTamBiscuit

veteran

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 2,134

Quote:

Originally Posted by mpethybridge

Is there a way of measuring how much more aggressive they might be in late position ie with position?

05-04-2009 , 07:28 PM

#1341

mpethybridge

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 16,997

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimTamBiscuit

Is there a way of measuring how much more aggressive they might be in late position ie with position?

I'm not sure. I'm going to be playing around with HEM over the next couple of weeks trying to figure out what can and can't be done.

05-05-2009 , 05:52 AM

#1342

dagrim1

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,530

Quote:

Originally Posted by mpethybridge

That sounds logical yeah, knowing when to do something is more important then knowing that you should be doing something sometimes

Overall stats only say so much of course, if they have massive postflop skills they could outplay you tons even with a 42/5/2 style. But still surprising to me.

05-05-2009 , 06:13 PM

#1343

QQ-Q u a d s-QQ

journeyman

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 343

Quote:

Originally Posted by dagrim1

Who do you people consider the best regs on FT? People to keep an eye out for?

And ehm, someone have info/notes on me? 50NL FR, xxxdagrim1xxx (without the xxx-es). Only played 15k-ish hands so far, started previous month on fulltilt.

the only player i would look out for is this player named QQ-Q u a d s-QQ
player is a beast but thats all i kno

05-05-2009 , 06:55 PM

#1344

RRizGod

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,265

Quote:

Originally Posted by mpethybridge

I don't think there is a major difference.

Youll find the occassional good player that will 3 bet more from late position or the blinds.

As long as you try and find tables with fish and leave tables all full of regs you can probably win at close to the same win rate.

Probably the only difference is pyscological in terms of the amount of money won and lost is more.

05-05-2009 , 07:43 PM

#1345

cds0699

LOSING

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 9,018

Quote:

Originally Posted by mpethybridge

the average reg at both levels plays 12/8/2.2

So thats why I'm a 12/9/3.4 nit, good to know

05-06-2009 , 03:20 PM

#1346

MATEUSZEK

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 3,598

Page 3? Guess the tables must be really good right now if no one is posting.

05-06-2009 , 04:18 PM

#1347

mpethybridge

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 16,997

Quote:

Originally Posted by QQ-Q u a d s-QQ

the only player i would look out for is this player named QQ-Q u a d s-QQ
player is a aggro-fish but thats all i kno

05-06-2009 , 04:53 PM

#1348

King Spew

Just average

Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 15,223

Quote:

Originally Posted by QQ-Q u a d s-QQ

the only player i would look out for is this player named QQ-Q u a d s-QQ
player is a beast but thats all i kno

Yeah I look out for this playah too. He's on my buddy list so luckily, finding him is just one click away.

05-06-2009 , 04:58 PM

#1349

King Spew

Just average

Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 15,223

Hey Matt, do you know...

if there is some way to tweak HEM table manager to show a table that has disintegrated? With PAHUD, the VPIP would go to X when no cards are dealt so you could instantly see when a table has no players any more.

Helpful when having a few minimized tables open and playing elsewhere....