Checking river isn't going to change anything unless you'd fold to a jam on the river. Maybe villain bets less and you save a little, but by not being like you did in the river you'll lose value from AK/AQ weaker two pair type hands. Just a cooler.
Imo check/folding river is mubsy.
Last edited by Havick; 09-06-2018 at 01:17 PM.
Reason: Grammar
But if you were willing to go all-in/call all-in on the river, you should have 3 bet shoved the turn in case villain had a flush draw or pr+fl draw to have him fold his drawing equity or have him make a bad call if that is what he had.
I dont like leading river, but im certainly check/calling. Also, in the future try not to put the result of the hand in the title, knowing the outcome can change the way people analyze hands.
NL10 is NL10, people call for set mining and you need to be careful not losing all your money there. I would size flop same, bet turn larger and fold to a larger re-raise turn. But vs his sizing I would call and fold vs river jam.
I agree with ducky. I don't like the 4x raise PF. If you don't lead the river, maybe villain bets 1/2 instead of jams over, and you save a few BBs. Sometimes BBs you save in bad situations are just as valuable as ones that you win in good situations.