You gave his stats which seem decent (over 100 hands) but his flop sizing seems odd to me. His range would much rather use a larger sizing on this board than 1/3.
I think OTR you have to consider what you think he's actually capable of bluffing (especially at 10NL), I'm sure a solver would have you call QTdd (probably close to 0ev) at some frequency, but I think if you delete a lot of the optimal bluffs in his range, (AJo, AQo, ATo, AQs, AJs, ATs, A9s, A8s, JTs, T9s, etc) it becomes more of a fold.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anjunbeats
So I should propably rather call 88 than QTdd here?
No. I don't think having diamonds here matters as much as you think. You can probably just get away with calling most of your Kx, AQo, AQs, and you still have quite a bit of 7x (87s,76s). QTdd is probably close in theory but in practice I wouldn't think this spot is bluffed enough at 10nl to be close to optimal.