Quote:
Originally Posted by Salvinorum
good point
thanks. Not sure about range but it leans towards things that beat you I think. In fact I am surprised he shoves without the J.
The main thing here is that stove seems to be bandied around like the be all and end all solution to tricky spots, just because it can do maths. The thing is:
goods maths tool + bull**** input = still bull**** output.
Not to be hating on stove, but use it wisely. Only where you can actually range someone decently. Especially where the equity answer will be marginal eg, needing 32% equity to call and stove giving you 36%. If you have put one hand to many in there you are no longer good.
Another thing I feel is it does not seem to be used correctly to weight the frequency with which certain moves are made. As an simple example, assume we know miraculously he can only have AA and KQs preflop: will he call the flop raise with AA? Yes, always 100%. Will he call it with KQs? Not always(say 70%) but that means that KQ should be discounted as such in the calc. If you simply stove those two because KQ
could be in his range you will get a very incorrect answer without weigthing KQ.
Its not a vey good example but I hope you get the point.
Okay end of rant. Disclaimer; I still think stove probably the best tool in terms of trying to find the correct play, just realize it is not magic. Like in your example, it looks like a clear call when it isn't.
I tend to think its a fold or at least a waaay more marginal call. I dont see two pair shoving this straight board. Thats just bluffing with SD value.