Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
****May LC Thread****NSFW ****May LC Thread****NSFW

05-02-2009 , 11:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoRy
Sigh +1
sorry guys... i mean, wasnt 1992 - 1998 good enough?
05-02-2009 , 11:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayluf
sorry guys... i mean, wasnt 1992 - 1998 good enough?
Greed is a funny thing.
05-02-2009 , 11:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freakg
Thanks for the tip Radeh im gonna clean it up when... im not so lazy haha

I wanna play the FTOPS/MiniFTOPS, whats your opinion on the Sats to these events?
the super turbo shootouts could not be more fun.
05-02-2009 , 11:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grow
****in CELTICS!!! YEA!
fmp

05-02-2009 , 11:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayluf
sorry guys... i mean, wasnt 1992 - 1998 good enough?
Are you serious? I mean, this would have more merit if someone like Miami, Atlanta, Orlando won but..

Boston Celtics has 18 (EIGHTEEN!) Championships. At least one in each decade except the 90s. 98 was 11 years ago.

Boston fans can fornicate themselves with an iron stick if they ever complain about "running bad". /family guy
05-02-2009 , 11:52 PM
**** yeah pacman! hatton knocked the **** out in the 2nd round
05-02-2009 , 11:56 PM
***** hatton man wait all night im ****ed and you let this happen man wtf
05-03-2009 , 12:16 AM
*yawn* standard 21st century Chicago lolplayoffs moment

Damn good series, but this game 7 was like playing an HUSNG where the all in person never loses, and at 100/200 you shove into AA with something and lose anyways.
05-03-2009 , 12:23 AM
so thats ricky totaly ****ed now gg dude wp
05-03-2009 , 12:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan
anybody want a free coaching session in next hour
Thanks for that Nathan, top man.

You made me understand just how big a nit i actually am haha :P
05-03-2009 , 12:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan
so thats ricky totaly ****ed now gg dude wp
Yeah Hatton fcked it, left himself too open and his movement was poor.

Manny was great again and his tactics were good.
05-03-2009 , 12:33 AM
If I had won this pot I would have met my requirements to move up to 400nl!

Full Tilt Poker Game #11997133905: Table Price (heads up) - $1/$2 - No Limit Hold'em - 0:15:11 ET - 2009/05/03
Seat 1: OMGRachelBilson ($217.50)
Seat 2: suphuvinh ($235.05)
suphuvinh posts the small blind of $1
OMGRachelBilson posts the big blind of $2
The button is in seat #2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to OMGRachelBilson [Qs Ad]
suphuvinh raises to $4
OMGRachelBilson has 15 seconds left to act
OMGRachelBilson raises to $16
suphuvinh calls $12
*** FLOP *** [2s Qc 2h]
OMGRachelBilson checks
suphuvinh has 15 seconds left to act
suphuvinh bets $24
OMGRachelBilson has 15 seconds left to act
OMGRachelBilson calls $24
*** TURN *** [2s Qc 2h] [Kc]
OMGRachelBilson checks
suphuvinh bets $195.05, and is all in
OMGRachelBilson calls $177.50, and is all in
suphuvinh shows [Ts Jd]
OMGRachelBilson shows [Qs Ad]
Uncalled bet of $17.55 returned to suphuvinh
*** RIVER *** [2s Qc 2h Kc] [9h]
suphuvinh shows a straight, King high
OMGRachelBilson shows two pair, Queens and Twos
suphuvinh wins the pot ($434.50) with a straight, King high
OMGRachelBilson adds $200
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $435 | Rake $0.50
Board: [2s Qc 2h Kc 9h]
Seat 1: OMGRachelBilson (big blind) showed [Qs Ad] and lost with two pair, Queens and Twos
Seat 2: suphuvinh (small blind) showed [Ts Jd] and won ($434.50) with a straight, King high

LOL!
05-03-2009 , 12:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All_or_Nothing
Thanks for that Nathan, top man.

You made me understand just how big a nit i actually am haha :P
biggest nit i actualy met imo wanting to 2nd pair to my river shove wtf
05-03-2009 , 12:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All_or_Nothing
Yeah Hatton fcked it, left himself too open and his movement was poor.

Manny was great again and his tactics were good.
totaly ****** ****ed what a ****ing loser, basicly exactly what maywether did but 4x faster, he learned nothing god my dreams have been crushed on him twice now time to go lubricate my gf with my tears
05-03-2009 , 12:40 AM
05-03-2009 , 12:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan
totaly ****** ****ed what a ****ing loser, basicly exactly what maywether did but 4x faster, he learned nothing god my dreams have been crushed on him twice now time to go lubricate my gf with my tears
lol

yeah thats his career over. gg hatton.

Manny vs Floyd < what a fight!
05-03-2009 , 12:50 AM
Ft for stars money anyone!?
05-03-2009 , 12:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All_or_Nothing

Manny vs Floyd < what a fight!
that will be epic
05-03-2009 , 04:42 AM
How many HU tables do u guys usually play at a time?
05-03-2009 , 04:56 AM
05-03-2009 , 11:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanJ.
How many HU tables do u guys usually play at a time?
used to play 4 but have since dropped to 2. Probably has something to do with not getting enough games but I can pick up way more reads with only 2.
05-03-2009 , 11:28 AM
In SNGs I play 2. I don't like 3, game drops off. (I 9-tabled FR cash)
05-03-2009 , 12:48 PM
I am just beginning to get used to grinding 3 HU cash tables at once, FINALLY. I'm a long ways away from 4 being as I've never even had 4 running at the same time. But, the journey starts someplace.
05-03-2009 , 01:10 PM
so i was playing ThePhenom919, my internet glitched and i dc'd when we were at 25/50 and i had ~1250. i came back on 6 mins later, he blinded me down to ~255. we've never played before, but obv he's respected player. i requested him to ship the equity when i dc'd. is that request not fair? he explained how 'i would do the same thing' and its 'not his problem'. personally, i sit out in those spots for a reasonable amount of time. but, i mean.. any recourse here?
05-03-2009 , 01:11 PM
I only play 3 or more if one of the players is a huge fish who I won t even need to think against. Otherwise I just play two.

      
m