I like playing regs, good or bad, unless they are really GOOD then I get scaredddddddd, but I give action, lets play. COME on MEBSTER, one timeeeeeeeeeeeeee
I like playing regs, good or bad, unless they are really GOOD then I get scaredddddddd, but I give action, lets play. COME on MEBSTER, one timeeeeeeeeeeeeee
I don't know if this the right place to post this but anyway, I'm looking to play vs HU regulars, at 0.25-0.5, 0.5-1 or 1-2 on pokerstars. My regular games now are 3-6 and 5-10, so it's best if you are playing 2-4+ too. I would like to play 4 tables, 1000 hands matches, that's about 90 minutes. PM me with your aim or msn if interested, so we can discuss the details.
i like how a third of this thread is people saying they dont like the idea of the thread, a third is people making jokes about how the games will die if this thread exists and then the third people are (seriously or in jest) afraid of consists largely of comments about as insightful as "OMG, xxxx is so ****ing terrible. how does he beat anyone?"
anyone who plays semi-regularly at a given stake knows who the good regs are. this thread changes very little. especially since the people in this thread account for a significant portion of the regs.
if you're playing anything under 3/6, there will always be enough random idiots sitting with 40bb, or taking shots with full stacks, to go around.
i, for one, like this thread and am eagerly awaiting a post discussing how im terrible by briefly mentioning a couple hands completely out of context.
They have a 2+2 account with the name "tableratings"...save him time and effort (especially if he has no case which i have no clue about) and pepper those idiots with pm's to either make it possible to exclude self, or shut site down.
would be a nice thread if everybody post it serious. i wish most posters do that in this thread, but its ok..
ps: ozzy 87 is the ozzy who usually play nosebled high stakes on ftp? i remember a really strong player called ozzy, but dont remember if was ozzy_89, ozzy 187, ozzy87, ozzy 76.
I love tableratings because it seems like it only caught my failures at 5/10 and my extremely long downswing at 2/4 and 3/6. I get called out all the time after a standard hand because tableratings has me down so much
well Colts, i think you're a ****ty donk on the heater of a lifetime.
and in the future, if you're going to sit with me, i'd appreciate if you didn't run after playing 32 hands and winning 1 stack with JT>J19 on a JT9 flop.
the fact that you can win depresses me at how bad i must be running.
well Colts, i think you're a ****ty donk on the heater of a lifetime.
and in the future, if you're going to sit with me, i'd appreciate if you didn't run after playing 32 hands and winning 1 stack with JT>J19 on a JT9 flop.
the fact that you can win depresses me at how bad i must be running.
haha, im on a lot, he's welcome to sit and play a few tables with me any time i'm free. im not playing higher then 10/20 now, so it wouldnt really be 4rollllzzz. its just funny when someone constantly posts about how awesome they are then flakes out like a little bitch. and no this isn't the first time he's hit and ran me on ftp or cake. i just figured that now that he has money, maybe it would give him class.
haha, im on a lot, he's welcome to sit and play a few tables with me any time i'm free. im not playing higher then 10/20 now, so it wouldnt really be 4rollllzzz. its just funny when someone constantly posts about how awesome they are then flakes out like a little bitch. and no this isn't the first time he's hit and ran me on ftp or cake. i just figured that now that he has money, maybe it would give him class.
I'm about to own your soul with one statement. I was being coached by Internet Pokers at the time you idiot, so if you thought that play was shoddy you can go take it up with Internet Pokers and HU him 4 rollz. The reason I quit your table is because our session was ending and INTERNET POKERS and I went over some theory. Good job sounding like a jackass though.