Quote:
Originally Posted by Pasterbator
yea i was gonna write something like this. This argument is fine for 6max games because most of them wouldnt run if 2 good players don't start playing HU. And if a fish comes, the rest of the table snap fills with bumhunters...i can see that being annoying. But for HU, there is no reason at all for a "bumhunter" to give action to a good player. If they want to sit all day and wait for fish and get in 300 hands while "playing" for 7 hours, be my guest. With the new FTP rules. everyone has the same chance to get a fish so whether or not someone is a bumhunter doesn't matter at all.
The HU community needs to get over that term.
Yours truly,
A non-bumhunter
ty. this animosity towards bumhunters who arent also sitting at 893856 tables makes very little sense to me. some people play poker for money and not ego. if they realize they're not that good and/or want a low variance, low stress approach, it's perfectly logical to sit there all day waiting for idiots.
i mean, this is almost the same as demonizing people who play a ton of hours or 4+ tables at a time. "THEY'RE TAKING ALL THE FISH. SOOOOOOO UNFAIR!!!!"
i play basically anyone at my stakes (with the exception of about 5 people who have ridiculous win rates and i have played before). if you have really good numbers on TR and someone quits you after a couple hands when you sit them, that is a rational decision on their part.
whining about bumhunters who dont clog up the lobby is being a nit about other people's nittiness.