Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* *******HU CASH Regs thread*******

04-19-2009 , 01:32 AM
the super user - nice hit and run

grow a pair
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 03:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixiesFTW
i wish FTP was like stars and table blocking was actually effective
someone who hit and runs and grimms people saying this is incredible
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 04:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjbourne
My bad. You must have misunderstood. When I said "I think" I was implying that the following words would be my opinion. Let me clarify:

In my opinion, 4 empty tables is fine for me because I am willing to play 4 tables against anyone. I do not game select/bumhunt at all.

In my opinion, A player sitting at 4 empty tables and bum hunting is gayer than a Provincetown summer (imo). However, I should not be punished because a bunch of nits want to play droolers all day.

If you disagree with my opinion than you are wrong.

Just open 4 and open more when they sit down.
Dunno what's so hard.
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 05:23 AM
urubu i dont have chat, im playting a bunch, cant play rite now
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 05:33 AM
ok fees, i respect you and i understand why you don't want play now.

btw i am so tilted w/ ALL REGS at ftp hu cash games. NOBODY plays poker!!! (except fees, jungleman and few others).serious, why people who are BETTER than me (like cauchyshort, rockieNFL and others) don't give me action??????? they are better than me and still don't play w/ me. nowadays regs just play against someone they have HUGE edge.

i am bored... i want play poker, i see 10000 players sitting alone and nobody plays... so sick!!!!!probably i won't play hu anymore... this game just don't happen. isn't like 'its hard to get action'. its IMPOSSIBLE to get action, even against players who are BETTER than me.

i don't remember the last time i played w/ a reg who was worst or like me. only regs who are WAAAAY better than me give me action, like rolandthetrault and others vvvv goodplayers.

come on guys, lets have some fun, lets play poker.
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 05:35 AM
hahaha bumhunters, i got a weak at 25/50 and you don't!!! hahaha

edit: maybe he is good. but w/e, at least i got a game!

Last edited by urubu111; 04-19-2009 at 05:41 AM.
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 05:45 AM
omg... the ****** idiot hit n ran. wtf

probably gg hu games. 6max here we go fkcing bumhunters!@!!! !!!!!!
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 07:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjbourne
My bad. You must have misunderstood. When I said "I think" I was implying that the following words would be my opinion. Let me clarify:

In my opinion, 4 empty tables is fine for me because I am willing to play 4 tables against anyone. I do not game select/bumhunt at all.

In my opinion, A player sitting at 4 empty tables and bum hunting is gayer than a Provincetown summer. However, I should not be punished because a bunch of nits want to play droolers all day.

If you disagree with my opinion than you are wrong.
Since everyone else is doing it right now and you don't deny action, I agree that it's fine. However, if everyone else was sitting at 1 empty table, you should obviously not sit at 4, if only to keep the others in line.
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 08:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by urubu111
omg... the ****** idiot hit n ran. wtf

probably gg hu games. 6max here we go fkcing bumhunters!@!!! !!!!!!
If you wanna play 2/4 I will 4 table you. Let me know

Edit:If I lose a lot fast I might quit
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 08:45 AM
ya teejay, we could 4table 2/4. and no problem if you quit fast because you lost a lot.

we can do this later because now i need sleep a bit.
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 10:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eX3cution
Since everyone else is doing it right now and you don't deny action, I agree that it's fine. However, if everyone else was sitting at 1 empty table, you should obviously not sit at 4, if only to keep the others in line.
I guess thats part of my point, but I also think that having only 1 empty table isn't the answer. Haven't there been numerous times when the same ****** sits at 2 of your empty tables and donates? I'm not positive a player like this cares enough to sit at one, ask you if you want to 2 table, then search to find you.

I agree that this is probably how the bumhunting started however there is no way to force the HU nits to play anyone. I think it has just become the nature of the beast and hopefully the player pool can handle it.
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 11:03 AM
omfg are you ****ing joking me?

if somebody sits at 2 of your empty tables they know how to use the ****ing lobby. they found 2 of your tables through the mess of 75 empty tables I think they can find you at 1, say "let's play 2", you give them next table name.

holy **** you are tilting the **** out of me with your ignorance
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 11:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjbourne
I'm not positive a player like this cares enough to sit at one, ask you if you want to 2 table, then search to find you.
I'm not positive either.
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 12:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LT22
omfg are you ****ing joking me?

if somebody sits at 2 of your empty tables they know how to use the ****ing lobby. they found 2 of your tables through the mess of 75 empty tables I think they can find you at 1, say "let's play 2", you give them next table name.

holy **** you are tilting the **** out of me with your ignorance
I've never had some drooler ask me to play more than 1 table, even when all my tables are full. I can remember, multiple times, having an idiot sit at 2 and start playing.

I might be wrong, and am willing to concede to those of you that have experience not sitting at empty tables.

Regardless, my goal is to have 4 tables going. It just seems much more likely that I will achieve this the fastest by having the tables open already.

Their is no point arguing this any further. I do not bumhunt. I do not sit out against anyone, unless we play at least a couple hundred hands and I feel they have a significant edge for whatever reason. I have 4 tables open because that's the amount of action I want. I do not have 4 tables open waiting to play 1 table against the worst player I can find, like most regs.
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 12:24 PM
i declare fjbourne the winner of this argument. by the power vested in me, i hereby grant you full permission to sit at 4 empty tables, whenever you please, without having to justify it to anyone
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 02:03 PM
Hallelujah
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 02:15 PM
Yeah I dont see the problem with regs sitting at 4 empty tables per limit(tho I'd like it to be 2) as long as they play regs. Am I the only person who has a competitive nature and actually enjoys scrapping it out with pretty much any regs?
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 02:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Ward
Yeah I dont see the problem with regs sitting at 4 empty tables per limit(tho I'd like it to be 2) as long as they play regs. Am I the only person who has a competitive nature and actually enjoys scrapping it out with pretty much any regs?
nope, just bumhunters itt
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 03:20 PM
I don't understand this arbitrary cap that is supposed to be placed on these players. How did we arrive at 4? Why is 4 ok, and 5 is too much? Why is 3 too little?

The only actually reasonable answer is to make the limit 1 table, as it is not difficult or time consuming to open another table once you get action. No one is going to be getting so much action that only having 1 table open at a time is going to affect them and everyone knows it. So basically what this comes down to is an unwillingness to sacrifice what is nothing more than a very small convenience in exchange for what most believe to be the betterment of the game. (I don't really understand the argument that this is not the case. It is obvious that people are only opening 16 tables or whatever to "extend the net" so to speak, so that they may gain some advantage, to the detriment of everyone else.)

Unfortunately, none of these policies are enforceable by us. It can only be enforced by the site. All the aggression and dick waving in this thread is meaningless and won't achieve anything. Organizing and letting your concerns be known as a whole to FTP/Stars/whatever is the only productive option you have.

I don't even know why I posted this tbh. I just don't understand how there can be so many pages of the same argument without progressing at all.
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 03:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwmartin
I don't even know why I posted this tbh. I just don't understand how there can be so many pages of the same argument without progressing at all.
It's repetitive, but the table max is now 4, so that's something.
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 03:49 PM
bautotrimm is sitting at all my tables and claims _I'm_ a blocker. lol the f*ck?

how u guys usualy react to such ******s?
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 04:03 PM
I know this probably wouldnt work, but Id love for one site to create HU cash tables where the players are assigned randomly to a partner (ie. enter a waitlist and get matched bla bla) and a minimum amount of hands are required before either player can quit, unless they lose their buy in.

-Obviously this removes the table select edge many enjoy, but it could be pretty fun...
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 04:17 PM
not only would it not work, but that's not even logical! that's like a HU tournament gone ******ed
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 04:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixiesFTW
I know this probably wouldnt work, but Id love for one site to create HU cash tables where the players are assigned randomly to a partner (ie. enter a waitlist and get matched bla bla) and a minimum amount of hands are required before either player can quit, unless they lose their buy in.

-Obviously this removes the table select edge many enjoy, but it could be pretty fun...
dude are all your forum posts to set up some kind of image that you're not a bumhunting hit-n-running douche?
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote
04-19-2009 , 04:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by React1oN
dude are all your forum posts to set up some kind of image that you're not a bumhunting hit-n-running douche?
who is he?
*******HU CASH Regs thread******* Quote

      
m