lol the FT lobby looks like it wuda done 3 years ago for HUNL haha

I dont see what stoploss has to do with moving up? I just follow the bankroll guidelines wich have an upper limit, where i move up, and a lower limit, when i move down. Has nothing to do with stoploss per day or anything.

hate myself for responding again about this but I am weak. I never said once anything about his attempt at an apology, whether it was a ****** one or not makes no difference to my opinion on the ordeal.

Well I'm taking a shot not moving there permanently. When you double the stakes like this, it sucks to see a 10bi downswing that is equivalent to 20bi in your normal limit. Thats why, this time, i set a stoploss for my first shot (i don't follow any BI rules but i waited until i had 50bis to try it).

Any other input is welcome.

J

Need a coach to skim through 2k hands of mine today and tell me, how often i've misplayed and how often i was really unlucky, because right now I see only 5-10 marginal spots in where i really spewed, but I've ran into hand after hand in like almost every single spot against every recreational player and every underdog sucked out on me or coolered pretty bad. Last time this happened in February, since then was not so bad. I feel completely clueless now.
Please, PM. Thanks.

Looks like the font issue was my ****ing table mod. Oh well, I hope they get an update for that soonish

I think setting aside 5 BI is fine

1st downhill is February vast majority is NL200, last downhill is November and again same NL200, other downhills is taking shots at higher limits, so it's not that bad. I want to work with coach in that matter, what's going on at those downhills, i just get slapped with almost every single spot of facing unreal scenarios of combination of super bad run/setups/badbeats everything is working awfully wrong:

Can I use my "One Time" for this? Eh, F*** it.

ONE TIIIIIIME!!!

Since you sold in percentages. I would assume we all get the % you sold us and just get a rebate on the extra money we sent

as someone largely involved in the initial prop and who still talks to gary pretty regularly, i definitely think that you're on the right track here, but i also think its completely fair for anyone to bring it up because it should definitely be available information for anyone not familiar with the prop/confession/etc. so that they can make an informed decision in the future. i've been a large supporter of just slapping an undertitle on his name but for some absurd reason that's never happened.

nl200

i keep getting shown two pair here from rando fish, and every once in a while it's like A5 or diamonds or w/e, is anybody actually folding here with these stacks?

BB: $75.80
Hero (BTN/SB): $326.25

Pre Flop: ($3.00) Hero is BTN/SB with K A
Hero raises to $6, BB calls $4

Flop: ($12.00) 2 A 8 (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $8.00, BB calls $8

Turn: ($28.00) J (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $17.00, BB raises to $34, Hero raises to $130, BB calls $27.80 all in

River: ($151.60) T (2 players - 1 is all in)

yeah pretty well said, my thoughts exactly

at Kaby. This **** happens to me all the time and I always see 2 pair but we are never folding given stack sizes. He had J8 right? lol

Yeah this. I asked for 1/3 of your action, not like I specifically wanted $333 of action. Don't mind taking a rebate since we asked for percentages. Thanks for being legit and giving the option though.

when fish who raise 12% otb think they're a genius...

PokerStars - $0.50 NL (2 max) - Holdem - 2 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 3

SB: $72.15
Hero (BB): $50.50

SB posts SB $0.25, Hero posts BB $0.50

Pre Flop: ($0.75) Hero has A Q

SB calls $0.25, Hero raises to $2.50, SB calls $2.00

Flop: ($5.00, 2 players) 8 4 A
Hero bets $4.50, SB calls $4.50

Turn: ($14.00, 2 players) 9
Hero bets $9.00, SB calls $9.00

River: ($32.00, 2 players) 4
Hero bets $34.50 and is all-in, SB calls $34.50

Hero shows A Q (Two Pair, Aces and Fours)
SB shows A K (Two Pair, Aces and Fours)
SB wins $100.50

I think an undertitle would probably be taken as a joke by a lot of people because 95% of them are jokey and the others are like "MSNL HU CHAMP" or whatever.

Yeah we've all agreed about this at the house too. It just makes sense.

its a really bad spot because hes probably not playing a draw that way being a rando passive fish. I think you call turn and prob fold to most sized river bets on most rivers. ONe could argue that its a turn fold though, its a pretty strong line hes taking to be honest and hes probably not capable of deception.

Call turn and fold river? What? villain has 27 left

o then i might consider folding but since hes so short maybe he could have a worse hand for value so it def changes things, didnt notice stacks at first

Although I see the point of the under title not always being taken seriously, I think it is still a good idea. I don't think scamming should ever be forgotten. I also don't think you can bring that up too often. It is the single worst thing you can do as a gambler. It is the one thing the community can not and should not ever justify.

The attempt at a justification is pointing out how young someone is. That is ridiculous. I don't care if someone is 78 or 19. It isn't like they were 6.

18 is certainly old enough to know not to cheat a whole community.

i mean i dont want to clutter the thread since it probably needs to be sent to sklansky or something but basically i think it was a stupid mistake, and i think he's done a lot to regain trust and has been legit in a lot of transactions and bets with me and other people after the fact. he also is using the old account in an attempt to not hide anything, so putting an undertitle that's pretty clear or a location or something would be so much better and just let everyone make their own informed financial decisions in the future. by no means do i think he's off the hook, ever, for any reason. but certainly there's a better way to handle it than just having him constantly be accused of "hiding out in the hu forum" or "trying to ditch his past" when that's not the case at all.

I agree with the under title for sure. Though without one, I don't think never mentioning it is a good solution.

Having read the whole thread, I don't think it falls under just "a stupid mistake".

Agreed.


But I also think that OTPKOP (and some other guys) spamming it in every thread he posts in is getting a bit annoying, undertitle or something similar to that would be the best solution imo.