PokerStars - $0.10 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BTN: 104 BB
Hero (SB): 100 BB
BB: 34 BB
UTG: 387 BB
MP: 182 BB
CO: 100 BB

Hero posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has 9 9

fold, fold, fold, BTN raises to 3 BB, Hero raises to 12 BB, fold, BTN calls 6 BB

Flop: (22 BB, 2 players) T 6 3
Hero bets 7 BB, BTN calls 6 BB

Turn: (35 BB, 2 players) 5
Hero checks, BTN bets 24 BB, Hero raises to 85 BB and is all-in

You bet big on these flops so don't like cbet sizing.

Just call turn you are ahead, jamming doesn't make much sense.

Hero bets 7, BTN calls 6? 😝

power of position

BTN also only put in 6 v. a 9bb raise preflop.

Lol I didn’t see that

lol wtf is this HH

Busted

Fake hh converter needs more work

Call on the Turn.

I was way too ill the other day and couldn't explain myself.

Reason I posted was because it caught me out while playing a gto+ solution.



Solver likes putting 99 in the x/jam range. And as I don't really have a bluff x/jam range I thought it was interesting. It also uses 99 when fed a pool based/fishier button calling range. GTOw doesn't, but the GTOw button calling range for this spot is way too unrealistic to be useful imo.

Anyway, i'm x/jamming KK/QQ/JJ here (much more than a solver would because it seems more effective IRL). So having at least some bluffs seems apt. Not sure about using FDs because we want BU to have all those? And i think BU will have stab/folds and FDs that we actually dominate even when called in his range, so it sort of makes sense to use some mergey punts to neutralise. Just wasn't sure it's applicable enough at micros.

I thought that, but solver actually likes a reasonable b33 range. GTOw uses b33 almost exclusively.

Can you post your GTOw flop sim? This is what I have.



Mostly using B75

ah, I was looking at 50nl sim because i'm a micro fish



(AJ lol jam)


GTO+ with realistic pool BU calling range:

I think the problem with the 50nl sim is it's not even giving bigger sizing's as an option. It just has B33/Jam so naturally it will pick B33.

My general approach is to play GTO OTF and then to exploit on later streets where the discrepancies are bigger between theory and population (and the pot is bigger). I wouldn't classify B33 OTF as a mistake I just prefer a bigger sizing for this reason.

Ok, fair point

whats the reason you fake hand histories?

to piss you off

you are a scammer?

Why do you want to bet big? What about a ten high flop with a mid card favors a preflop 3bettor? Only good thing i see is it isn't that coordinated?

I like this with 99 vs pool. People don't 4-bet enough and probably stab too much of their air OTT when we bet small flop. Tbh small bet flop could be interesting exploit although I think B50 preferred. Don't think we need to go B75 against pool given how they construct 4-bets

One concern is likely not enough xr OTF with Tx vs the smaller size.

Yeah I think lack of 4b is relevant to both spots. On the one hand they have far more TT+, but on the other they're so ridiculously diluted with junk on turn (my pool data is something like 3x overcall vs gto preflop)

As in, they carry too many calling hands OTT?

One thing solver does that I like is x/jam A9/K9/Q9ss, presumably because it cuts down on those Tx calls

One concern is likely not enough xr OTF with Tx vs the smaller size.