Dude record a session on youtube and I'll go through all hands and give advice for free.
Not saying I'll make you a profitable player, but It will definitely help!

Lets go!

Graphs are so bad that I literally cried out of laughter.
If it's for real, infact real I'm happy to help

Also yes, please! Be active in the microstakes forum. Share your thoughts for hands and etc

It looks pretty legit to me; a legit nightmare that is.

Have you ever considered that perhaps people purposely call you with crap to see if they can spike to tilt you? Your tilt = profit for them, obviously. I would run you down with bottom pair and try and hit two pair or trips if I know you would eventually start spewing stacks left and right.

You can't control how other people play...at all.

Post some stats. Your main basic stats as a screenshot. Posting graphs is pretty nonsense. Your EV is as down as your total winnings (or losses ). So you are not unlucky but just purely bad. Yes, they suck you out too but you get it in even worse more often than not.

Make a screenshot of your stats. You know how to use PT4, so there is no excuse.

People still falling for this lol.

Sometimes I think they just push the buttons randomly. The same nicknames from Russia, Ukraine, Colombia, Latvia etc .have been sitting on the tables for years. If they play still on nl2 and maybe a little nl5 they can't be so good that I can't beat them.

Sometimes they call down with A high, sometimes they raise turn with nuts, sometimes with air. Sometimes they bet river and I call and lose but times when I fold they show bluff. And you can imagine what happens when I first call night after night rivers and lose every time and the one time I think they have better they show me bluff with total crap.

Sometimes when I get first hand AA, second hand QQ and third hand AK nobody calls. After that I try and push all in A3 and they call me down with K high, what the fu*k???? There is no logic in any of their moves.

Yeah yeah, still no stats or hard evidence besides some crappy graphs.

I just want some good few memes from this thread

It's time to post the stats my G, or you're just trolling. Do it and we will help you. Atleast VPiP PFR and Agg or AF. All of them would be the nice but a couple should help us get you on the right track. So.... Post the stats

Assuming this is all real, VPIP has to be like 80%. And if this is actually real, OP you need to quit poker. There is no helping you. Poker is not for you.

^ I like how this is this guys first post and he's like Thanks OP

[x] Plays 10,000 hands of 2NL.
[x] Pays $100 in rake. (Fifty buy-ins in rake!)
[x] Wins 35% of hands.
[x] Loses $800.
[ ] Standard.

You're winning more than double the number of hands of most people, but losing ten times as much money. Since you're apparently incapable of stopping yourself from open-jamming all the time, you should just quit. Or switch to SpinGos or something.

Maybe even try the columns on roulette.

I had another account at some point but could not remember the login or the email registered. I made this one somewhat recently. Within the last couple months. Hope that's not against the rules. I tried like 10 different emails. No idea what it was.

Plus, it doesn't take an expert poker player to tell this guy that he's wasting his time with a leisure activity(hobby, whatever you want to call it) that he is obviously terrible at. But those hand histories are atrocious. Coupled with the whole "it's rigged against me" sort of thought process, it's just clear this guy should not be playing. To anyone with half a brain.

Or he's just a troll. In which case, I guess I took the bait.

It's because for your graphs to be true, you'd have to be one of the worst players to ever play the game, but at the same time you are tracking it all like a reg. It just doesn't compute.

When you put it like that it really does not make sense...

On other forum one guy who's been playing years for living said that I am the biggest loser in history counted as buy ins. That's where topics title comes from.




Stats are here. But remember one thing. If you just say play tighter (as on other forum was the situtation) you're underestimating those villains. Even the loosest limp caller minraises every 2 caller will fold if you just play couple of hands. They will notice it.

...45/39/26...

...biggest loser in history...

...play tighter...

...enter excuse which has no quantifiable basis for support here as to why I shouldn't play tighter...

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

You would really need to have a lot of time on your hands to make this s**t up, lol.

Lol yeah those 2NL crushers. They're serious.

Typical situation goes like this: Villain who plays 70-80% hands minraise in every hand. 10 times all fold, then second time you raise with goods and he folds. But if you raise him 3 times in those 10 rounds he start to call you. And if he hits something or gets draw he will continue in the hand.

Which one of your 50 poker books told you to play 44/38 with a 25% 3 bet?

I wonder why # of hands was cut off of that screenshot

Don't feed the troll.

me2 brother

I doubt these are the right stats. Even with those stacks it should be impossible to lose 1 1/2 stack per 100 hands. And it´s not bad luck since your EV is the same.

Seems more like you 3bet A3o and then shove any flop? I mean people must realize how bad you are. You are not unlucky, you are just bad.