Quote:
Originally Posted by NJD77
I never get why people equate roll size to the games people should play. I was playing 50nl, and occasional $100nl on a $20k roll up until recently (a good chunk of that roll came from my old sng career) when I had to cash out a big chunk, but that doesn't mean to say I can beat 200nl or 400nl. My skill level and appetite for swings just isn't anywhere near the required level for that.
Likewise, if I was confident in my skill level I'd be more than happy to play under rolled at a level and accept the risk of going broke.
Usually when people have large rolls, it's because they won that money at the cashgame tables, and there's 2 ways to do so. By being a good player and winning at a good winrate, or by being a **** player, playing a million hands a month and cashing in rakeback.
Anyways my point is, usually players with a big roll do have the skill to move up but just dont cause they're comfortable at a certain level, I know for a fact you know a few players like this, and are potentially hurting their long term EV.
But yes, in a sense I agree with some of the things you say. Granted I also think at the micros people should be aggressive when taking shots. Playing 50nl with a 20k roll, and specially when you're you, seems like a massive waste of potential long term EV.