Quote:
Originally Posted by Ojune
having x equity doesn't mean you'll realize x
sometimes it's ok to cbet range with less than 50%, sometimes correct to check range with more than 50%
I'm not sure what you're trying to demonstrate with these %?
I'm not a solver nor am I a mensa member. If I can illustrate, moreso to myself, in a manner I can understand just how overall ranges interact after a given action, based on what I think they are preflop of course, I will have a good idea of the strategy I want to employ in the future. I don't want to do a thing because a solver or another player tells me I should do without knowing why. In this instance, if checking is going to widen Vs range when he bets and give me an overall equity advantage, and a significant one, with our entire continuing ranges, then that's a reason to x, imho.
Doing things blindly just because someone on the net told me to or because a solver told me to do it doesn't help me to my satisfaction. I want to know why; no offense of course to solvers' programmers or folks who use them. I'm sure they work great for people who understand how to use them to their full extent. Solvers, nor 2p2 members, will be playing my next session, nor will either give much of a **** whether I play well enough to beat these games.
Tl;Dr.