Testing all PokerSites on NL25 & NL50 - Micro Stakes Pot Limit and No Limit

Two Plus Two Forums Poker Strategy Online No-Limit Hold’em Cash

Testing all PokerSites on NL25 & NL50

Post Reply Subscribe

...

10-20-2017 , 06:34 AM

Buffalmacco

stranger

Join Date: Oct 2017 Posts: 6

Hey guys,

i decided to start a journey through all Poker Rooms. I will test on NL25; NL50. I started at PokerStars.

I want to check, if the competition on Pokerstars is easier because of the absence of rakeback or if other Sites are more interesting with their combination of competition and rakeback.

Here are my result on PokerStars for the last 100k hands:

https://picload.org/view/dgwgraii/re...stars.png.html

Whats your experiences?

Quote

10-20-2017 , 08:30 AM

lovelessRAGE

adept

Join Date: Jul 2016 Posts: 725

First deposit on PokerStars? Just continue testing and you will be surprised

Quote

10-21-2017 , 04:21 AM

Buffalmacco

stranger

Join Date: Oct 2017 Posts: 6

Quote:

Originally Posted by lovelessRAGE

First deposit on PokerStars? Just continue testing and you will be surprised

Do you think other sites are better or worse?

I am mostly concentrated on the winrate+rakeback. I a bit surprised, cause i often read Pokerstars is very tough. I play 9bb+ with 12 tables and there where sooo many big whales.

Quote

10-21-2017 , 10:33 AM

Kalicola

stranger

Join Date: Oct 2017 Posts: 1

Do you think that regs are moving to other sites for rakeback and therefore more bad players stay on PokerStars?

I'm quite new in Online Poker and started with PokerStars as well.

Quote

10-22-2017 , 05:22 AM

Buffalmacco

stranger

Join Date: Oct 2017 Posts: 6

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kalicola

Do you think that regs are moving to other sites for rakeback and therefore more bad players stay on PokerStars?

I'm quite new in Online Poker and started with PokerStars as well.

that´s the big question. Remembers me on the mark-efficiency theory from the stock markets.

I will give an list how many tables at every limit are availabe on several times in the next days. Give an pro and contra list and test the 5 most interesting sites.

Quote

10-23-2017 , 04:47 AM

jay94

old hand

Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 1,477

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buffalmacco

Over how many hand sample is this? I'm sure it won't last on one of the toughest sites around to play on. If it's the case keep on keepin on, why go anywhere else, where games will never be an issue.

Quote

10-23-2017 , 12:13 PM

sinnaJ

old hand

Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 1,458

What is this. PS advertising?

That winrate seems very unsustainable to me considering that rake on Stars 25/50 is about 8bb/100.
If you net beat Zoom for 17bb/100 its time to move up i believe
How do you 12 table Zoom btw?

Last edited by sinnaJ; 10-23-2017 at 12:20 PM.

Quote

10-24-2017 , 03:32 AM

Buffalmacco

stranger

Join Date: Oct 2017 Posts: 6

Quote:

Originally Posted by sinnaJ

What is this. PS advertising?

That winrate seems very unsustainable to me considering that rake on Stars 25/50 is about 8bb/100.
If you net beat Zoom for 17bb/100 its time to move up i believe
How do you 12 table Zoom btw?

no PS advertising. Zoom just 4 tables at the begin of the session. Talked to a Rakeback - Site, they mentioned i am right, i can table select on PS best, but its possible to on 3-5 other sites parallel.

I will try this. Which sites you will recommend? I am interested on NL50 - NL200.

I am not sure how big is the stress-factor to play different sites parallel. Whats your experiences here?

Quote

Post Reply Subscribe

...